Image
Timothy Carter
Author
Blog Thumbnail
4/30/2025

How To Write Efficient Memory Allocators for PyTorch Extensions

If you’re building custom extensions for PyTorch, you’ve probably spent some time thinking about how to manage memory in your AI application development. After all, one core reason people turn to PyTorch in the first place is for its efficient handling of tensors on CPUs and GPUs. But once you dive into writing your own extensions—maybe for specialized operations or hardware—you need to ensure your memory allocation logic doesn’t turn into a bottleneck or a memory leak.
 
This article will walk you through essential considerations and best practices for writing efficient memory allocators as part of PyTorch extensions. By the end, you’ll have a clearer sense of what pitfalls to avoid, what strategies to implement, and how to keep your performance stats looking healthy.
memory

Understand Why Custom Memory Allocators Are Even Necessary

 
You might be asking yourself why you’d need a custom memory allocator in the first place. Isn’t PyTorch already well optimized? In most cases, the built-in memory management is more than adequate. However, there are specific scenarios—especially when integrating specialized hardware accelerators or working with unique data structures—where you need fine-grained control over how memory is requested and released.
 
For example:
 
  • Certain hardware might perform better with particular alignment constraints.You may want to optimize data transfers between CPU and GPU memory for complex models.
  • You might be reusing allocated blocks to minimize overhead if your extension performs repetitive tasks with similarly sized tensors.
  •  
    By implementing your own allocator, you can impose rules that match your hardware architecture or performance goals, essentially tailoring memory management to your unique extension.
     

    Familiarize Yourself With PyTorch’s Memory Model

     
    Before you start crafting a custom allocator, remember that PyTorch already handles GPU memory efficiently for most use cases. It uses caching mechanisms to avoid expensive re-allocation calls and to streamline GPU memory usage. In fact, one of the big advantages of PyTorch is that it abstracts away a lot of this complexity for you.
     
    Still, if you truly need a custom approach, be mindful of how PyTorch creates tensors:
     
  • It typically uses an Allocator object (from the C++ side) to request memory.
  • When you write your own allocator, you’ll conform to the same interface, ensuring your extension’s approach remains compatible.
  • PyTorch automatically tracks references to memory resources, so your logic needs to be well integrated to avoid double frees or inaccessible memory.
  •  
    This might sound complicated, but once you understand that your allocator needs to “play in the same sandbox” as PyTorch’s existing mechanisms, you’ll be in good shape.
     

    Layout & Alignment: Don’t Overlook the Basics

     
    It’s tempting to dive into advanced caching or memory pooling strategies right away. But a big part of writing an efficient allocator is getting the fundamentals right—particularly memory alignment and layout.
     
  • Alignment: For CPU-bound tensors, using at least 64-byte alignment often helps performance. For GPU-bound tensors (especially on certain architectures), aligning buffers to 256 bytes or more can significantly reduce kernel launch overhead.
  • Layout: Consider whether you’re stacking data in a row-major or column-major pattern, or if you’re using a custom structure-of-arrays format. The layout impacts how quickly your code can stream data from memory.
  •  
    If most of your extension’s operations revolve around the same data sizes and shapes, you could carve out well-aligned blocks to reuse repetitively rather than constantly allocating and freeing them. This approach helps reduce fragmentation over time.
     

    Manage Fragmentation With Pooling Strategies

     
    When your extension repeatedly allocates and deallocates various tensor sizes, memory fragmentation becomes a real headache. One of the best ways to handle this is to implement a memory pool. Essentially, you create a “pool” of pre-allocated blocks that your extension can quickly hand out when needed.
     
    Let’s say your extension frequently needs 512 KB blocks. Instead of constantly calling malloc or new for each block, you can keep a pool of these blocks on standby. When your code requests memory, it simply pulls from the pool—if the block is available, you hand it over immediately; when it’s done, you put it back into the pool for reuse.
     
    Benefits of pooling include:
     
  • Reduced overhead for repetitive tasks that request similarly sized blocks.
  • Less fragmentation in long-running processes or training sessions.
  • Potentially smoother performance under heavy loads.
  •  

    Make Debugging Easier (Yes, Even Allocators Need Debugging)

     
    One thing people sometimes forget is that memory allocators can be tricky to debug. The dreaded segmentation faults, double frees, and silent data corruption can plague your extension if you’re not careful. The key is building in sanity checks and logging from the start.
     
  • Allocate a small overhead region at the start or end of blocks to store “canary bytes” that help detect buffer overruns.
  • Keep a verbose debug mode that prints allocations, frees, and references when you suspect a memory leak or corruption.
  • Use PyTorch’s built-in memory summary tools (like torch.cuda.memory_summary()) to compare how your allocator usage coexists with the default allocator.
  •  
    Yes, these checks might reduce performance slightly in debug mode. But they pay big dividends when something goes wrong, and you need to narrow down the cause.
     

    Integrate Gracefully With PyTorch’s Caching Allocator

     
    Even if you create your own approach, you may still want to live harmoniously alongside PyTorch’s default caching allocator, particularly on the GPU side. You can do so by delegating part of your logic to PyTorch’s built-in mechanisms for certain tensor sizes or for unknown shapes. Then for specialized shapes that your extension handles frequently, do your custom approach.
     
    For instance, if you’re building a specialized extension for 3D volumes in medical imaging and you know a typical batch size, you could handle that. But any time you see a shape that doesn’t fit your expected profile, let PyTorch’s default allocator handle it. This way, you’re not trying to reinvent a one-size-fits-all solution for every possible scenario.
     

    Keep Data Transfers in Mind

     
    Fast memory allocation alone won’t win all battles—especially if your CPU and GPU need to shuffle data back and forth. If your extension regularly transfers data across the PCIe bus (or via NVLink in some setups), you’ll want to schedule your allocations in a way that minimizes overhead.
     
  • Use pinned (page-locked) memory for CPU tensors that need to be quickly sent to GPUs. It can speed up transfers but also means your system can’t swap that memory, so use it judiciously.
  • Think about how you batch these transfers. Repeatedly sending small batches can erode performance. Consider grouping your operations in ways that let you move bigger chunks of data less frequently.
  •  

    Measure, Don’t Just Assume

     
    It’s one thing to guess that your custom memory allocator is more efficient. It’s another to measure it rigorously. PyTorch includes profiling tools (like the autograd profiler) to help you measure memory usage and runtime. Combined with external profilers such as Nsight Systems (for NVIDIA GPUs) or perf (for CPUs), you can pinpoint where your code spends too much time or memory.
     
    Check the following:
     
  • Throughput: Are you seeing faster or slower throughput with your custom approach compared to PyTorch’s default?
  • Latency: Has the time per forward pass changed? This often reflects overhead in allocation or deallocation.
  • Memory usage overhead: See if your custom pool is hogging too much memory and leaving little room for other parts of your application.
  •  

    Aim for Simplicity Where Possible

     
    It might sound counterintuitive after hearing about caching, pooling, alignment, and canary bytes, but simpler is often better. Over-engineering a memory allocator can lead to unpredictable performance quirks and complicated debugging. The best solutions tend to do just enough to handle the specific performance or memory pattern issues you face—no more, no less.
     
    So, start by identifying your real bottlenecks. If you discover that your extension only occasionally needs custom memory allocation, a simpler approach might suffice. If you’re repeatedly dealing with large blocks of identical sizes, a specialized pool is probably enough. Resist the urge to add layers of caching for every possible scenario if you don’t truly need them.
     

    Final Thoughts

     
    Building or tweaking a memory allocator for PyTorch extensions sounds daunting, but it’s often just a matter of clarifying your needs and implementing a tailored strategy. Start by understanding how PyTorch handles memory internally, then align (both literally and figuratively) your custom approach with best practices like caching, pooling, and careful alignment. Don’t forget robust testing and debugging—a few lines of logging or canary bytes can save you massive headaches later.
    Looking for a Python developer? You've come to the right place. Get in touch with us today.
    Author
    Timothy Carter
    Timothy Carter is the Chief Revenue Officer. Tim leads all revenue-generation activities for marketing and software development activities. He has helped to scale sales teams with the right mix of hustle and finesse. Based in Seattle, Washington, Tim enjoys spending time in Hawaii with family and playing disc golf.