AI ERP with agents inside the systems you run
AI phone and voice agents for real calls
LLM.coPrivate, self-hosted LLM deployments
Legal AI infrastructure for firms
AI RFP discovery and response drafting
Automatic.coBusiness process automation
CyberAttack.aiThreat detection and defense
Secure AI virtual data rooms4–8 wks
Typical Next.js MVP
Core workflow, deployed, real foundation
100%
Senior engineers, US-based
No offshore handoff mid-build
Every sprint
Working software on a preview URL
Not a status deck between milestones
100%
Code and hosting account yours
From the first commit
Architecture decisions
What Next.js adds on top of React, and where the decisions live
Next.js isn't just React with routing bolted on — it changes where code runs and when. Getting these decisions right up front is most of what separates a Next.js app that's fast and cheap to operate from one that isn't.
App Router over Pages Router
The App Router is where Next.js development has moved — nested layouts, Server Components by default, and streaming are built around it. A new Next.js project has little reason to start on the older Pages Router, and an existing Pages Router app is usually worth migrating deliberately rather than never.
Server Components vs. Client Components
Server Components render on the server and ship no JavaScript to the browser for that piece of the page — the default in the App Router, and the right choice for anything that doesn't need interactivity. Client Components are for the parts that do: forms, anything with local state, anything that listens for a browser event. Mixing these deliberately, not defaulting everything to `"use client"`, is what keeps the bundle small.
Rendering strategy, chosen per route
Static generation for pages that don't change per request (marketing pages, most blog posts), server-side rendering for pages that need fresh data on every load (a dashboard, a personalized page), and incremental static regeneration for pages that change occasionally but don't need to be dynamic on every hit (a product catalog). Applying one strategy to the whole app is the single most common Next.js architecture mistake we see.
Server Actions vs. API routes
Server Actions let a form submit directly to server-side logic without a separate API endpoint, which removes a layer of boilerplate for straightforward mutations. A public API meant to be consumed by something other than this app's own UI still belongs in a Route Handler, not a Server Action.
Edge vs. Node.js runtime
Edge functions run closer to the user and start faster, but they run a restricted JavaScript runtime — no full Node.js API surface. Most application logic runs fine at the edge; anything that needs a Node-specific library or a longer execution window belongs on the Node.js runtime instead.
Image and font optimization aren't optional extras
`next/image` and `next/font` solve real Core Web Vitals problems — layout shift from unsized images, render-blocking web fonts — automatically, when used instead of worked around. Skipping them and hand-rolling image tags is one of the more common ways a Next.js site underperforms a plain static site on Lighthouse.
When Next.js is the right call
Next.js for a real product, something simpler for a brochure site
Next.js is a genuinely good default for most public-facing products, but "genuinely good default" isn't the same as "the right choice for everything."
A fast MVP that doesn't need a rebuild after you raise
Next.js is a common framework of choice for getting a new product to market fast, because it gives you a real, scalable foundation — server rendering, routing, deployment previews on every commit — rather than a client-only prototype you'd otherwise have to rebuild once real users and real data show up. The smallest slice that proves the idea should still be what gets scoped first; Next.js just means that slice doesn't need to be thrown away later.
E-commerce is a strong fit
Server-side rendering for SEO on product pages, ISR for a catalog that updates without a full rebuild, and straightforward backend integration for a cart and checkout flow are exactly what Next.js is built for. Most e-commerce work here is Next.js plus a headless commerce backend rather than Next.js alone.
A five-page brochure site doesn't need App Router complexity
If the whole site is static content that rarely changes, a simpler static site generator — or even a well-built CMS theme — gets there with less to maintain. Next.js's rendering-strategy decisions matter when an app actually has a mix of static and dynamic needs; forcing them onto five pages that never change is unnecessary overhead.
A dashboard or authenticated app doesn't need static generation at all
Behind a login, where every page is personalized and SEO doesn't apply, Next.js's static and ISR strategies mostly don't come into play — server rendering or plain client-side data fetching does most of the work. That's a legitimate Next.js use case too; it just uses a narrower slice of what the framework offers.
What's involved
Next.js engagement types
The variable that moves a Next.js build's scope isn't page count — it's how many routes need dynamic rendering versus static, how much of an existing site has to migrate, and whether deployment is going to Vercel or a self-hosted target.
| Engagement | Commitment | Timeline | What's included |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next.js MVP | Fixed scope | 4 – 8 weeks | Core workflow, App Router architecture, rendering strategy per route, and a first deployment. |
| Migration from Create React App or a legacy SPA | Fixed scope | 6 – 12 weeks | Routing, data fetching, and rendering moved onto Next.js, with a rendering strategy chosen per route rather than defaulted. |
| Headless WordPress or CMS frontend | Fixed scope | 6 – 12 weeks | A Next.js frontend consuming an existing CMS via its API, with ISR keeping content fresh without a full rebuild per edit. |
| E-commerce build | Fixed scope | 8 – 16 weeks | Product catalog, cart, and checkout on Next.js plus a headless commerce backend, with SSR and ISR applied where each actually helps. |
| Performance and Core Web Vitals audit | Fixed scope | 1 – 3 weeks | Rendering-strategy review, image and font optimization audit, and a prioritized fix list. |
| Ongoing Next.js support | Ongoing retainer | Ongoing | Standing ownership through framework upgrades, new routes, and hosting or infrastructure changes. |
Ranges assume US-based senior engineers and include a deliberate rendering-strategy decision per route rather than one pattern applied everywhere. A migration quote well under these bands is usually assuming every page migrates the same way — in practice a real site has a mix of static, dynamic, and semi-dynamic pages, and that mix is what the audit step exists to find.
Migration and integration realities
Where a Next.js migration actually gets complicated
Almost no Next.js project starts on a blank slate. These are the specific places a migration takes longer than the page-count would suggest.
From Create React App
Routing and data fetching both change shape — client-side routing gives way to the file-based App Router, and `useEffect` data fetching gives way to Server Components fetching directly. The React component logic mostly carries over; the surrounding architecture doesn't.
From a WordPress theme to headless
Moving a WordPress site's frontend to Next.js while keeping WordPress as a headless CMS is a common, well-supported path — but it means rebuilding every template as a Next.js page and wiring revalidation so a content edit actually shows up without a full redeploy. Skipping that last piece is how a headless migration ships with a stale-content bug on day one.
Vercel vs. self-hosted deployment
Vercel is built for Next.js specifically and removes most infrastructure decisions, at the cost of being a specific vendor with its own pricing model. Self-hosting on Node.js or Docker gives more control and can be the right call for specific compliance or cost requirements, but it means owning the pieces — image optimization, ISR cache invalidation — that Vercel provides out of the box.
ISR cache invalidation is easy to get wrong
Incremental static regeneration is powerful and also the source of a specific, recurring bug class: a content update that doesn't show up because the revalidation webhook or on-demand trigger wasn't wired to the right path. This is worth testing explicitly, not assumed to work because the code compiles.
API routes becoming Route Handlers
Next.js's App Router renamed and reshaped how backend API endpoints are defined compared to the Pages Router's `pages/api`. A migration that skips this and keeps the old API structure loses some of the App Router's benefits for no real reason.
Hiring
What to look for when hiring a Next.js developer
Next.js fluency starts with React fluency — there's no shortcut around that — but the framework-specific judgment on top of it is what actually separates a good Next.js hire from a good React hire who's used the framework once.
React fundamentals first
Next.js assumes real React proficiency — component design, hooks, state management. A candidate who's only worked inside Next.js's conventions without understanding the React underneath tends to struggle the moment a problem doesn't fit the framework's defaults.
Understanding the server/client boundary
Knowing which components should be Server Components, which need `"use client"`, and why, is the single most consequential Next.js-specific skill. Getting it wrong either ships unnecessary JavaScript to the browser or breaks functionality that needed to run client-side.
Deployment and observability experience
A candidate who's only ever run `next dev` and pushed to Vercel without thinking about caching headers, ISR invalidation, or error monitoring in production is missing half the job. Ask about a production incident they've debugged, not just a feature they've shipped.
TypeScript proficiency
Next.js's own APIs — route params, server actions, metadata — are more pleasant to work with typed, and a codebase that's inconsistently typed tends to accumulate the same runtime bugs a plain React app would.
Related
Related services
What Next.js projects usually connect to.
Questions
Common questions about Next.js development
What teams ask before a first call.
Next.js is a React framework that adds server-side rendering, static site generation, file-based routing, and API/server-action support on top of React's component model. Where plain React leaves routing, data fetching, and deployment as separate decisions, Next.js provides an opinionated, well-supported default for all three.
That's also why most public-facing products built with React today are actually built with Next.js rather than React alone.
Next.js when the product needs server rendering, SEO-friendly pages, or a mix of static and dynamic routes in one app — which covers most public-facing products. Plain React with Vite when the app is entirely client-rendered by nature: behind a login, not something search engines need to index, with routing and SEO not primary concerns.
See /react for the fuller version of that comparison from the React side.
Yes. React component logic mostly carries over directly; what changes is routing (moving from client-side routing to the file-based App Router) and data fetching (moving from `useEffect` calls to Server Components fetching data directly, in most cases).
We'll scope which routes benefit from static generation, which need server-side rendering, and which don't need to change rendering strategy at all — treating the whole migration as one pattern is the most common way this kind of project goes over budget.
Yes — server-side rendering for SEO on product pages, incremental static regeneration for a catalog that updates without a full rebuild, and straightforward integration with a headless commerce backend are exactly the combination Next.js was built to handle well.
Most of the actual commerce logic — inventory, payments, cart persistence — lives in the backend it integrates with rather than in Next.js itself; Next.js is the rendering and routing layer on top.
Vercel is built specifically for Next.js and removes most infrastructure decisions — image optimization, edge functions, and ISR cache invalidation work out of the box. Self-hosting on Node.js or Docker gives more control and can matter for specific compliance or cost requirements, but it means owning the pieces Vercel provides automatically.
We'll help you weigh that trade-off against your actual constraints rather than defaulting to whichever is more familiar.
It depends on whether the work is a new MVP, a migration from an existing framework or CMS, or an ongoing support engagement. What moves a quote most is how many routes need dynamic rendering versus static generation, and how much of an existing site or app has to migrate rather than get built fresh.
A scoping call produces a real figure faster than any range on a page would.
Yes — Next.js is a framework built on top of React, not a replacement for it, and real React proficiency (components, hooks, state management) is assumed. If your team doesn't have that yet, we can bring developers who do, or pair with your team to build that fluency alongside the project.
Rigorous code review, TypeScript throughout, automated testing (React Testing Library for components, Playwright for end-to-end flows), and a deliberate rendering-strategy decision per route rather than a framework default applied everywhere. Ongoing maintenance and monitoring are part of the standing engagement, not something bolted on after a launch-week fire.