AI ERP with agents inside the systems you run
AI phone and voice agents for real calls
LLM.coPrivate, self-hosted LLM deployments
Legal AI infrastructure for firms
AI RFP discovery and response drafting
Automatic.coBusiness process automation
CyberAttack.aiThreat detection and defense
Secure AI virtual data rooms
10 business days
To start a Unity engagement
Scoping through first sprint
100%
Senior engineers, US-based
No offshore handoff mid-project
Every sprint
A build you can put on a device
Not a status deck between milestones
100%
Code and Unity project you own
From the first commit
Where Unity fits
What Unity is actually good for, beyond "making games"
Unity is a real-time 3D engine first and a game engine second — the same rendering, physics, and cross-platform pipeline that ships a mobile game also ships a training simulator or a product visualization tool. The projects below share an engine but almost nothing else about what they need from it.
Games
2D and 3D titles across mobile, PC, console, and WebGL from one project, using Unity's own tooling for animation, physics, and UI rather than bolting a third-party framework on top of it. Cross-platform reach is Unity's strongest real advantage, and it's the reason most teams pick it over a native-only engine in the first place.
VR and AR
Unity's XR toolkit is the most mature cross-headset path available — the same project targets Quest, Vision Pro, and PC VR with platform-specific input and rendering handled through Unity's XR abstraction rather than three separate codebases. Training, visualization, and remote-collaboration builds are the categories that come up most.
Simulation and digital twins
A physically accurate 3D representation of a real system — a factory floor, a vehicle, a piece of equipment — driven by real or synthetic data. The engineering here is less about graphics and more about getting the physics and the data pipeline feeding the scene to actually match the thing it's modeling.
Product and architectural visualization
Real-time, interactive walkthroughs of a product or a space, built to run on a laptop or a tablet rather than requiring a pre-rendered video. Unity's lighting and material pipeline gets close enough to photorealistic for this use case without the render-farm time a film-quality tool would need.
Serious games and training builds
Compliance training, procedural simulations, and assessment tools that use game mechanics because they measurably outperform a slideshow or a PDF for retention. The engineering priorities shift toward analytics, branching logic, and LMS integration rather than toward graphics fidelity.
Real-time cinematics and previsualization
Unity's Timeline and Cinemachine tools let a team block out and iterate on camera work and sequences in real time instead of waiting on a render, which is valuable during previsualization even on projects that eventually ship a pre-rendered cinematic elsewhere.
What's involved
Unity engagement types
What moves the scope of a Unity project is not screen count or level count — it's how much of the work is new gameplay engineering versus taking over, stabilizing, or extending something that already exists.
| Engagement | Commitment | Timeline | What's included |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unity codebase audit | Fixed scope | 1 – 3 weeks | A read of an existing project's architecture, dependency risk, and performance profile, with a prioritized list of what has to change before new work starts. |
| New Unity build | Fixed scope | 8 – 16 weeks | A new game, simulation, or XR project from architecture through a shippable first build, including the platform-specific submission work for launch. |
| Multiplayer or backend integration | Fixed scope | 6 – 12 weeks | Networking architecture, matchmaking, save data, or analytics wired into an existing or new Unity project, built around the backend you already run wherever one exists. |
| Existing project takeover | Fixed scope | 4 – 10 weeks | Stabilizing and extending a Unity project built by a previous team or developer, once the audit has scoped what that actually involves. |
| Ongoing Unity support | Ongoing retainer | Ongoing | Standing ownership of a live Unity product through engine upgrades, platform certification changes, and new feature work. |
Ranges assume US-based senior engineers and include platform submission work rather than quoting it as a separate line. The audit is its own first step on a takeover because the honest scope of "fix this Unity project" is usually unknowable from the outside.
Architecture
The Unity decisions that are expensive to reverse
None of the following show up in a demo, and all of them show up the first time a build has to scale past a prototype. Getting them right early is far cheaper than unwinding them after a project is already in players' hands.
Render pipeline choice
Universal Render Pipeline (URP), High Definition Render Pipeline (HDRP), or the legacy Built-In pipeline aren't interchangeable at the end of a project — URP is the right default for mobile and cross-platform reach, HDRP for PC and console visual fidelity, and switching between them mid-project means re-authoring shaders and lighting, not flipping a setting.
Networking architecture
Netcode for GameObjects, Mirror, Photon, and a fully custom backend all solve multiplayer differently, and the choice depends on player count, latency tolerance, and whether the game logic can live client-authoritative or has to be server-authoritative to prevent cheating. Retrofitting server authority onto a client-trusting game is close to a rebuild.
Memory and asset management for mobile
Texture compression settings, addressables versus direct asset references, and object pooling decide whether a build fits inside a phone's memory budget and download-size limits. A project built without these in mind tends to work fine in the editor and crash or stutter the first time it runs on a three-year-old phone.
Platform submission requirements
Apple, Google, Steam, and console certification each have their own technical and content requirements, and some — console certification in particular — take real lead time and can bounce a build back for reasons unrelated to whether the game works. Budgeting that lead time before a launch date is promised avoids the most common cause of a slipped release.
DOTS and the Entity Component System
Unity's data-oriented stack (DOTS/ECS) delivers real performance gains for projects with thousands of simultaneously simulated objects — crowds, particle-heavy simulations, large-scale strategy games — at the cost of a steeper learning curve and a smaller pool of engineers who know it well. Most projects don't need it; the ones that do, need it badly.
Version control for a Unity project
Unity project files mix text-based assets with large binary ones (textures, audio, baked lighting data), which makes a plain Git repository slow and merge-unfriendly without Git LFS or a version control system built for game assets, like Plastic SCM or Perforce. Setting this up correctly at project start avoids a painful migration later.
Taking over a project
What actually happens when we take over an existing Unity project
A large share of the Unity work that comes to us isn't a blank canvas — it's a project a previous developer or team left mid-build, or one that's live and needs a team that can move fast without breaking what already works.
Dependency and package audit
Asset Store packages, third-party plugins, and Unity package manager dependencies get inventoried and checked for maintenance status and license terms before anything new gets built on top of them — an abandoned paid asset is a common source of a build that can't be reproduced on a new machine.
Performance profiling before promising a fix
Unity's own Profiler and Frame Debugger tell us whether a reported performance problem is a rendering bottleneck, a garbage-collection spike, or a physics issue, before we commit to a timeline for fixing it. Guessing at the cause is how a one-week fix becomes a six-week one.
Editor version and Tech Stream compatibility
Unity's Long Term Support and Tech Stream releases aren't always safely interchangeable mid-project — opening a project in a newer editor version can silently change behavior, and there isn't always a clean path back. We confirm which version a project actually needs before touching it.
Source control history review
Where history exists, it tells us what changed, when, and whether a regression is recent or has been there since the project's early commits. Where it doesn't — a project handed over as a single zip file — that's itself useful information about how the previous engagement was run.
Build pipeline reconstruction
A surprising number of handed-over projects build fine on the original developer's machine and nowhere else, because signing certificates, platform SDKs, or build scripts existed only locally. Getting a clean, repeatable build working on a new machine is usually the first milestone, before any feature work starts.
Scene and prefab hierarchy cleanup
Projects that grew without discipline tend to accumulate duplicated prefabs, scenes with dozens of loose scripts attached to nothing in particular, and naming that makes the hierarchy unreadable. We stabilize this incrementally alongside feature work rather than pausing the whole project for a rewrite nobody asked for.
Choosing an engine
When Unity is the right call, and when it isn't
Unity is the right default for most cross-platform 2D, 3D, and XR work, but it isn't the only answer, and pretending otherwise on every project isn't honest engineering advice.
Unreal Engine for photorealistic, graphics-first titles
When a project's whole value proposition is cutting-edge visual fidelity — AAA-style lighting, Nanite-level geometric detail — Unreal's rendering pipeline is built for exactly that in a way Unity's isn't, at the cost of a heavier engine and a steeper C++ learning curve for anything beyond Blueprint scripting.
A native engine for a single, performance-critical platform
A project that only ever targets one platform and needs to squeeze every cycle out of it — a competitive mobile game with a tight frame budget, for instance — can sometimes outperform Unity's general-purpose overhead with a native or custom engine, though that trade comes at the cost of Unity's cross-platform reach if the roadmap ever changes.
Plain web technology for simple 2D or UI-driven experiences
A lightweight 2D game or an interactive experience that lives entirely in a browser can sometimes ship faster and lighter on HTML5 canvas or a JS framework than inside a full 3D engine, particularly when there's no need for Unity's physics, lighting, or asset pipeline.
Unity's version fragmentation is a real maintenance cost
Long-lived Unity projects accumulate technical debt across engine upgrades the same way any codebase does, and a project stuck on an old LTS version eventually loses access to current platform SDKs. This isn't a reason to avoid Unity — it's a reason to budget for periodic upgrades rather than treating the engine version as fixed forever.
Asset Store dependencies cut both ways
A well-maintained paid asset can save real development time; an abandoned one becomes a liability the day a platform SDK update breaks it and nobody's fixing it upstream. Part of scoping a Unity build honestly is flagging which dependencies are load-bearing and which have a maintained alternative.
Related
Related services
What Unity projects usually connect to.
Questions
Common questions about Unity development
What teams ask before a first call.
What drives the cost of a Unity engagement is how much of the work is new gameplay and systems engineering versus stabilizing or extending an existing project, and how many platforms a build has to ship to at launch. A single-platform prototype is a much smaller scope than a cross-platform release with multiplayer and live-ops tooling.
A short audit or scoping call usually produces a real figure faster than a generic range would, particularly on a takeover, where the honest scope often isn't clear from the outside.
Gameplay systems in C#, the render pipeline and lighting setup, physics and animation state machines, UI, and — on most real projects — the backend and platform-integration work that isn't glamorous but is what actually ships a build: save data, analytics, in-app purchases, and platform submission requirements.
On a team project, a Unity developer is also reading and extending other people's scenes and prefabs, not just building new ones from scratch, which is a different skill than solo prototyping.
Yes — this is a large share of the Unity work we're brought in for. We start with a dependency and performance audit rather than promising a timeline before we've actually opened the project, because the honest scope of "finish what someone else started" depends entirely on what we find.
A clean, repeatable build on a new machine is usually the first real milestone, since a surprising number of handed-over projects only ever built successfully on the original developer's own computer.
Yes. Unity's XR toolkit is the most mature path for targeting multiple headsets — Quest, Vision Pro, PC VR — from one project, and it's what we use for training, visualization, and remote-collaboration builds rather than writing separate native code per headset.
The scoping conversation is usually about which headsets actually matter to the rollout, since interaction design and performance budgets differ meaningfully between a standalone headset and a tethered PC VR rig.
Unity is the stronger default for cross-platform reach — mobile, PC, console, and WebGL from one codebase — and for projects where iteration speed and C# scripting matter more than squeezing out the last degree of visual fidelity. Unreal earns its cost when photorealistic, graphics-first rendering is the actual point of the product.
Switching engines mid-project is close to a rebuild, not a migration, so this decision belongs at the very start, before any real production work begins.
Mobile (iOS and Android), PC, the major consoles, WebGL for browser-based builds, and VR/AR headsets through Unity's XR toolkit — often from a single project with platform-specific build settings rather than separate codebases per target.
Each platform still has its own certification and submission process, and console certification in particular needs real lead time budgeted into a launch date, not treated as a formality at the end.
Yes. The Unity project, its source repository, and any build or CI configuration are registered under your own organization from day one, not ours, with us added as collaborators. That's the only arrangement that lets you open the project, hire another team, or move to a different studio later without a handoff negotiation.
Submission — build signing, store listing requirements, and the review process itself — is scoped as part of a build rather than treated as an afterthought, since a rejected submission on launch week is one of the most common causes of a slipped release. We handle the resubmission cycle when a store flags something, rather than handing that problem back to you at the worst possible time.