AI ERP with agents inside the systems you run
AI phone and voice agents for real calls
LLM.coPrivate, self-hosted LLM deployments
Legal AI infrastructure for firms
AI RFP discovery and response drafting
Automatic.coBusiness process automation
CyberAttack.aiThreat detection and defense
Secure AI virtual data rooms10 business days
To start a Sitefinity engagement
Scoping through first sprint
100%
Senior engineers, US-based
No offshore handoff on a licensed platform
Every sprint
Working software on a preview URL
Not a status deck between milestones
100%
Code and configuration you own
Within your own Sitefinity license
What we build
Sitefinity work built around its .NET foundation
Sitefinity, from Progress Software, is a commercial CMS built on the .NET stack, aimed squarely at organizations that already run .NET internally and need enterprise governance features a self-hosted open-source CMS doesn't ship with out of the box.
Custom module and widget development
Sitefinity's MVC-based widget framework supports custom content types and page components built specifically for your workflows, beyond what its built-in widget library covers. Modules are built to integrate cleanly with Sitefinity's content APIs rather than working around them.
Active Directory and SSO integration
Sitefinity supports Active Directory and other enterprise identity providers natively, which is one of its real advantages for organizations that already manage user access centrally. Getting this configured correctly — roles, permissions, and publishing workflows mapped to your existing AD groups — is usually the first real piece of implementation work.
.NET application integration
Because Sitefinity is a .NET application itself, it integrates more directly with existing .NET services, internal APIs, and enterprise systems than a PHP-based CMS typically would. This is one of the strongest reasons to choose it when the rest of the technology stack is already Microsoft-centric.
Multi-site and multi-language deployments
Sitefinity's multisite architecture supports managing several related sites and localized content from a single install, with shared templates and governance. It's built for organizations running multiple brand or regional sites under one IT umbrella, not a single marketing site.
Platform upgrades and version migrations
Progress ships regular Sitefinity releases, and staying current matters more on a licensed enterprise platform than it might elsewhere — support and security patches are tied to the version you're running. Upgrade projects handle custom module compatibility and content migration between versions.
Migrations onto and off Sitefinity
Moving an existing site onto Sitefinity when the organization's IT requirements call for it, or migrating off Sitefinity to a different platform when its licensing model no longer fits, with content and URLs mapped so search visibility survives the move.
The platform decision
When Sitefinity is the right CMS, and when it isn't
Sitefinity is a licensed, enterprise-oriented product, and that's a genuinely different value proposition than an open-source CMS — worth being direct about before recommending it for a project that doesn't need what it offers.
Where Sitefinity earns its licensing cost
An organization already standardized on .NET and Active Directory, with governance requirements — role-based publishing, audit trails, content approval workflows — that a lighter CMS would need custom-built from scratch. Enterprise IT teams that want a commercial vendor to hold accountable for platform security and support also weigh toward Sitefinity over a self-hosted open-source option.
Where a lighter CMS is the honest fit
A marketing site or blog without complex governance needs, a team without existing .NET infrastructure, or an organization that would rather not carry ongoing licensing costs is usually better served by WordPress, Webflow, or a headless CMS. We'll say this plainly even when it means recommending a smaller engagement.
The hiring-pool trade-off
Sitefinity's specialized skill set means a smaller developer pool than WordPress or a mainstream JavaScript framework, and it's worth planning for that reality — both in who you can hire directly and in how you scope a vendor relationship for the long term, not just the initial build.
Licensing renewal is a planning input, not an afterthought
Sitefinity's commercial licensing renews on Progress's terms, and that cost and cadence should factor into the platform decision up front, alongside the development cost, rather than being discovered at the first renewal after launch.
What's involved
Sitefinity engagement types
What moves the scope here is less about page count and more about how much custom module and integration work the organization's existing systems require, and how many sites or languages a deployment has to govern.
| Engagement | Commitment | Timeline | What's included |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sitefinity implementation | Fixed scope | 6 – 14 weeks | A new Sitefinity site built and configured, including Active Directory integration and custom widgets for your content model. |
| Custom module development | Fixed scope | 3 – 10 weeks | Purpose-built content types and widgets integrated with Sitefinity's MVC framework and content APIs. |
| Version upgrade | Fixed scope | 3 – 8 weeks | Custom module compatibility review and content migration between Sitefinity versions. |
| Platform migration | Fixed scope | 6 – 14 weeks | Moving a site onto or off Sitefinity, with content and URL redirects mapped so rankings survive the switch. |
| Ongoing platform support | Ongoing retainer | Ongoing | Version updates, module maintenance, and a developer available for enterprise IT's release and audit schedule. |
Ranges assume US-based senior engineers and include the Active Directory and integration work a lighter quote often strips out or underestimates. Sitefinity's own commercial licensing is billed separately by Progress and isn't included in engagement scoping here.
Enterprise governance
What Sitefinity's enterprise features actually solve
The features that justify Sitefinity's cost over an open-source CMS are specifically the governance and integration tooling a large organization needs and would otherwise have to build custom — worth naming explicitly, since they're easy to undervalue from a feature list alone.
Role-based publishing workflows
Draft, review, and approval stages assignable by role, so content doesn't go live without the right sign-off — a real requirement for regulated industries or large marketing organizations with a formal review chain, and one a lighter CMS typically needs a plugin or custom build to replicate.
Centralized identity and access
Managing publisher access through the same Active Directory groups IT already maintains, rather than a separate set of CMS-only credentials, removes an entire category of access-management drift — the ex-employee who still has publishing rights because nobody remembered to revoke a separate login.
Auditability
Change history and publishing logs that satisfy an internal compliance or security review without a custom logging layer bolted onto the CMS afterward.
Vendor accountability
A commercial license means Progress is accountable for platform-level security patches and support in a way an open-source project's community isn't obligated to be. For an enterprise IT team, that's often worth the licensing cost on its own.
Multisite governance at scale
Managing shared templates, permissions, and content across several related sites from one install, with the access control to keep one region's editors from touching another's content.
Hiring a Sitefinity developer
What to look for before you hire
Sitefinity's smaller, more specialized developer pool makes vetting more important, not less — the difference between a developer who's configured Sitefinity's admin panel and one who can build a custom MVC widget or troubleshoot an Active Directory integration is significant.
.NET fluency, not just Sitefinity's admin interface
Sitefinity is a .NET application, and real customization work — custom modules, widgets, integrations — requires comfort with C# and the .NET stack underneath it, not just familiarity with the CMS's own configuration screens.
Enterprise integration experience
Active Directory, SSO, and integration with other internal .NET systems are common requirements on a Sitefinity project, and a developer without that specific experience will spend real time learning on your engagement rather than delivering against it.
A track record with upgrades, not just new builds
Because staying current on a licensed platform matters for support and security, ask specifically about upgrade experience — migrating custom modules and content between Sitefinity versions is a different skill from building a site from scratch.
Honesty about whether Sitefinity is the right tool at all
A developer who only ever recommends the platform they specialize in, regardless of what you're actually building, isn't giving you an honest read. Ask directly whether your requirements justify Sitefinity's licensing cost over a lighter alternative.
Related
Related services
What Sitefinity projects usually connect to.
Questions
Common questions about Sitefinity development
What teams ask before a first call.
It depends on scope: a full implementation, custom module development, a version upgrade, and an ongoing support retainer are all different-sized engagements. Sitefinity's own commercial license is a separate cost billed by Progress, not something bundled into development pricing.
What moves a development quote most is how much custom module and Active Directory integration work your specific enterprise environment requires. A short scoping call gets to a real number faster than any general range would.
Sitefinity is a commercial content management system from Progress Software, built on .NET, aimed at enterprise organizations that need role-based publishing governance, Active Directory-backed access control, and multisite management from a single install.
It's a genuinely different tool from an open-source CMS like WordPress — the value is in the enterprise governance and .NET integration, and it's the right fit specifically for organizations whose requirements actually call for those features.
If your organization already runs on .NET and Active Directory, and you need formal publishing workflows, audit trails, or multisite governance, Sitefinity's enterprise features are built specifically for that. If your needs are a marketing site or blog without those governance requirements, a lighter platform is usually the more cost-effective fit, and we'll say so directly.
The decision should weigh Sitefinity's licensing cost against what its governance and integration features actually save you in custom development elsewhere — not a general assumption that 'enterprise' always means 'right for us.'
Yes — this is one of Sitefinity's core strengths. Because it's a .NET application itself, it integrates more directly with internal .NET services and APIs than most other CMS platforms, and it supports Active Directory and other enterprise identity providers natively.
Getting the integration configured correctly — roles, permissions, and publishing workflows mapped to your existing AD structure — is usually the first significant piece of implementation work on a Sitefinity project.
Progress ships Sitefinity releases on a regular cadence, and staying reasonably current matters more here than on many platforms, since security patches and vendor support are tied to the version you're running.
An upgrade project needs to check custom module compatibility and migrate content between versions carefully — this is different work from a new implementation, and it's worth choosing a developer with specific upgrade experience rather than only new-build experience.
Yes, in both directions. Moving onto Sitefinity usually happens when an organization's IT and governance requirements call for it; moving off usually happens when the licensing model no longer fits the organization's needs or scale.
Either way, content and every existing URL get mapped with redirects so search rankings survive the move — that mapping work is what a rushed migration tends to skip, and what's most expensive to fix after the fact.