AI ERP with agents inside the systems you run
AI phone and voice agents for real calls
LLM.coPrivate, self-hosted LLM deployments
Legal AI infrastructure for firms
AI RFP discovery and response drafting
Automatic.coBusiness process automation
CyberAttack.aiThreat detection and defense
Secure AI virtual data roomslangflow
Langflow is an open-source platform for building and deploying AI workflows and multi-agent systems through a visual interface. It supports major LLMs, vector databases, and can be deployed as APIs or MCP servers without requiring deep coding knowledge.
Key facts
Objective fields from the source. Values we can't verify are shown as “Unknown” rather than guessed.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Repository | langflow-ai/langflow |
| Owner | langflow-ai |
| Primary language | Python |
| License | MIT — OSI-approved |
| Stars | 151.3k |
| Forks | 9.5k |
| Open issues | 974 |
| Latest release | v1.10.2 (2026-07-07) |
| Last updated | 2026-07-08 |
| Source | https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow |
What langflow is
Langflow is a Python-based (3.10–3.14) platform offering visual workflow composition, API/MCP server export, multi-agent orchestration, and integration with observability tools. It provides source code access for component customization and runs on local, Docker, or cloud deployments.
Get the langflow source
Clone the repository and explore it locally.
git clone https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow.gitcd langflow# follow the project's README for install & configurationNeed it deployed, integrated, or customized instead? DEV.co ships production installs.
Best use cases
Implementation considerations
- Requires Python 3.10–3.14 and uv package manager; verify compatibility with existing Python environments and dependency tooling.
- Desktop version available for Windows and macOS; evaluate whether cloud-first or self-hosted infrastructure aligns with operational model.
- Visual builder reduces entry friction but customization requires Python literacy; assess team skill distribution for maintenance and extension.
- Multi-agent features and observability integrations (LangSmith, LangFuse) add complexity; plan incremental adoption starting with single-agent workflows.
- 974 open issues as of snapshot; monitor release cadence and issue resolution velocity before committing to production timelines.
When to avoid it — and what to weigh
- Real-time latency-critical applications — Langflow's visual abstraction and orchestration overhead may introduce unpredictable latency; applications requiring sub-100ms response times should evaluate performance empirically.
- Offline or air-gapped deployments — Langflow integrations with external LLM APIs, vector databases, and observability services imply network dependency; fully offline scenarios require significant customization.
- Mature production systems with strict change control — Visual-first platforms may conflict with version-controlled, code-reviewed CI/CD workflows; teams prioritizing audit trails and rollback procedures should assess governance fit.
- Extreme scale with custom infrastructure — Enterprise deployments at massive scale may require custom resource management and optimization that extend beyond Langflow's built-in configuration options.
License & commercial use
MIT License (OSI-approved, permissive). Allows commercial use, modification, and distribution with minimal restrictions; retain original license notice and copyright.
MIT License permits commercial use without royalty or license fees. Review the SECURITY.md and deployment documentation for compliance and security hardening requirements in production environments. No commercial support model evident from data; assess vendor support needs independently.
DEV.co evaluation signals
Editorial assessment — not user reviews. Directional, with an explicit confidence level.
| Signal | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Maintenance | Active |
| Documentation | Adequate |
| License clarity | Clear |
| Deployment complexity | Low |
| DEV.co fit | Strong |
| Assessment confidence | High |
Project maintains a SECURITY.md policy indicating security process awareness. Visual workflows may obscure credential or API key handling; enforce environment variable injection and secret management at deployment layer. Integrations with external LLM and observability services inherit their security posture; audit third-party service trust boundaries. No evidence of third-party security audits; assess risk tolerance for pre-production deployments.
Alternatives to consider
LangChain
Mature Python SDK for LLM orchestration; lower-level than Langflow but more code control and finer optimization; appeals to developers preferring programmatic composition over visual builders.
n8n
Low-code workflow automation with visual editor and native integrations; stronger for non-AI workflows and enterprise IT automation; less AI-focused than Langflow.
Hugging Face Spaces or Modal
Lightweight deployment platforms for AI models and APIs; less workflow-centric but lower operational overhead for single-function services; better for stateless inference.
Build on langflow with DEV.co software developers
Evaluate Langflow for your workflow architecture. Start locally with pip install, review deployment requirements, and assess Python integration needs with your team.
Talk to DEV.coRelated on DEV.co
Explore the category and the services that help you build with it.
langflow FAQ
Can I use Langflow for production AI services?
Do I need to know Python?
How is Langflow maintained and supported?
What are the main deployment options?
Build it with a software development company
Considering langflow for production? DEV.co is a software development company that builds, integrates, and maintains ai frameworks software — and takes ownership of the parts your team would rather not run.
Ready to build AI workflows?
Evaluate Langflow for your workflow architecture. Start locally with pip install, review deployment requirements, and assess Python integration needs with your team.