AI ERP with agents inside the systems you run
AI phone and voice agents for real calls
LLM.coPrivate, self-hosted LLM deployments
Legal AI infrastructure for firms
AI RFP discovery and response drafting
Automatic.coBusiness process automation
CyberAttack.aiThreat detection and defense
Secure AI virtual data rooms2–4 wks
Brief to signed quote
No RFP process needed
0
Client contacts we initiate
Ever, without your sign-off
100%
Work presented as yours
Under NDA, every project
1
Point of contact, our side
Not a rotating account team
Why agencies bring in a build partner
The technical work you can't staff, won't hire for, and shouldn't have to turn down
None of these are reasons to apologize to a client. They are reasons the agency model works: you are built for strategy, creative, and media — not for carrying a full engineering staff through the slow months between technical projects. The agencies that handle this best don't try to become a dev shop; they get good at knowing when to bring one in.
A specialist skill nobody on staff has
An AI feature, a payments integration, a migration off a legacy CMS — the kind of build that needs someone who has done exactly this before, not someone learning it on the client's clock. Bringing that skill in for one project is cheaper than hiring for it and hoping the next client needs the same thing. It also means the engineer shows up having already made the expensive mistakes, instead of making them on your invoice.
Capacity that spikes and then disappears
A launch season, a new business win, three client builds landing in the same month — the workload an agency needs for six weeks a year, not fifty-two. Staffing permanently for the peak means paying for idle engineers the rest of the time. The slow months are just as real as the busy ones, and a payroll built for the peak doesn't shrink to match them.
The hire that doesn't pencil out
A senior engineer costs six figures loaded, and a single technical account rarely keeps one busy. Bringing in a partner for the build avoids a hiring decision you would likely reverse a year later, once the account that justified it moves on. By then you're left explaining a headcount line nobody quite remembers agreeing to.
Work you would otherwise decline
Turning down a build because it is outside what your team does costs more than the fee — it tells the client to look for a full-service shop next time they have something technical. Saying yes and quietly resourcing it protects the account instead. It's the version of that decision that doesn't come back to bite you twelve months later.
A second opinion on someone else's estimate
When a client's internal IT team or another vendor hands back a number that seems off, you need a sanity check you can trust before you push back or accept it. We will tell you plainly when a number is reasonable, even when it isn't ours. That candor costs us nothing and saves you from either overpaying a vendor or underselling your own client relationship over a number that was actually fair.
Maintenance nobody on staff wants to own
A client site or app that needs ongoing engineering — security patches, a hosting migration, a slow query nobody can find — is not a good use of a designer's week. It is a good use of ours, billed however you and the client have already agreed to structure it. It's unglamorous work, and unglamorous work is exactly what quietly damages a client relationship when nobody owns it.
The relationship is yours
Why protecting the client relationship is the actual point
Everything else on this page is in service of one fact: the account is worth more than any single project inside it, and a partner who forgets that is not a partner worth having, no matter how good the code is. Protecting it isn't a courtesy we extend — it's the actual product.
The account outlasts the project
A client relationship is a multi-year revenue line; the build in front of you is one invoice inside it. A vendor who treats the project as the whole relationship will eventually do something that costs you the account to save themselves a step. Pricing the relationship for the long term, not just the invoice in front of you, is what separates a partner from a vendor.
What it looks like when a vendor goes around you
An engineer who emails the client directly to 'clarify a requirement.' A partner who pitches follow-on work to the client without looping you in. Both look small in the moment, and both are the fastest way to lose an agency's trust permanently — not just on this project, but on every one after it. Neither one requires bad intent; a well-meaning engineer trying to be helpful can do just as much damage as someone deliberately angling for a bigger contract.
Why that doesn't happen here
We don't have the client's contact information unless you give it to us, and we don't go looking for it. Every question, every deliverable, and every follow-on conversation routes through you, because the account is yours to manage and ours to support quietly underneath it. It's a policy, not a favor, which means it holds even on the day a client would genuinely be easier to just email directly.
You explain the work in your own words
You present the build to the client on your timeline, in your language, taking the credit for solving their problem. That isn't a courtesy — it is the entire reason a build partner is worth paying for over a freelancer the client could just as easily find themselves. It's also why a client stays a client of yours, instead of discovering the moment something goes technical that they no longer need you in the loop.
What good protection actually looks like
It isn't a clause you keep in a drawer in case something goes wrong. It's a working habit: every deliverable routes through you, every follow-up question comes back to you first, and anything that could turn into a pitch gets declined until you're in the room. You should never have to wonder what was said to your client without you there.
The alternative costs you more than the project
An agency that gets burned once by a vendor going behind its back doesn't just lose that client — it often starts insourcing everything technical out of caution, including the work it would have been smarter to keep outsourcing. One careless partner can undo years of a comfortable division of labor.
How the commercial side works
Retainer or fixed project — billed to the agency, never split with the client
A few ways agencies structure this, depending on whether the work is one build, a running need across the year, or a scope you're not ready to commit to yet. Either way, one invoice, addressed to you.
| Arrangement | Commitment | Best fit | How it's billed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scoping only | Fixed, credited toward the build | Before you're ready to commit to a full engagement. | A short paid engagement that turns a rough client ask into a real, buildable scope. |
| Fixed-price project | Per project, fixed scope | A single client build with a defined scope and deadline. | One invoice to the agency at agreed milestones. |
| Retained bench | Monthly, cancel at 30 days | Recurring client work across the year — several builds, ongoing requests. | Monthly to the agency, scaled at renewal, not mid-project. |
| Embedded pod | Monthly, ongoing | Enough steady technical volume to justify a standing team. | A lead plus engineers, reported on your cadence. |
| Maintenance & support | Monthly, per client | Keeping a delivered site or app running after launch. | Billed to the agency per client; mark it up to the client however you choose. |
Cost is driven by scope, not a rate card — how many systems the build has to agree with, how much of the creative brief still needs to be interpreted into requirements, and how tight the deadline is. We don't take a commission on what you charge the client and we never ask what your margin is. A specific number comes out of a short scoping call once we've seen the brief, not out of a table like this one. Ask what's included in any quote you get elsewhere, too — QA, deployment, and project management are real costs, and a number that leaves them out just moves those costs to a change order later.
Working inside your process
Your tools, your brand system, your brief — not a request for a spec
The agencies we work best with never write a formal technical specification, and we don't ask them to start. The brief you already wrote for the client is enough for us to scope from — asking for more than that just adds a step neither of us needs.
We scope from the creative brief
A brief written for a client, not for an engineer, is what we actually work from. We translate it into a scoped build ourselves rather than bouncing it back and asking for documentation your team doesn't produce. It also means we don't generate a change order for something that was implied but never spelled out — we ask first.
Your project management tool, not ours
Asana, Monday, ClickUp, whatever your team already runs — we work inside it rather than asking you to check a separate portal for status on top of everything else on your plate. It also means we never introduce a workflow you'd have to explain to your own team after we're gone.
Your brand system governs the build
Design tokens, component library, style guide: we build to what you hand us rather than introducing a second design language the client would notice sitting next to your own work. Consistency there is part of what makes the final build look like it came from inside your agency.
Status on your cadence, not a separate one
Reporting matched to how you already update the client, so our update becomes an input to yours rather than a second meeting series you have to attend on top of the one you already run. You get a status you can paste straight into your own client update, not one you have to translate first.
One point of contact on each side
A single person on your team and a single lead on ours. Every extra person in the loop is a chance for a requirement to get lost somewhere in translation, and fewer people means fewer meetings to reschedule when a decision needs revisiting.
We flag scope creep before it becomes a client conversation
When a client's ask grows mid-build, we tell you before it shows up as a delay, so you're the one managing the client's expectations rather than finding out at the same time they do.
When the client asks something you can't answer
The technical question that lands in your lap mid-meeting
It happens on almost every technical build: the client asks something specific enough that guessing is a real risk, and you are the one sitting in the room when it comes up. The goal is that you're never caught flat-footed by a question you had no way to see coming.
We prep you before the call, not during it
Ahead of any client meeting where a technical question is likely, you get a plain-English answer and the talking points behind it — not a document full of terms you'd have to translate live in front of the client. The goal is that you never sound like you're reading from a script you don't understand.
'Let me confirm and follow up' beats a wrong guess
We would rather you say that in the room and get the real answer from us within hours than watch you improvise something we then have to walk back later, in front of the same client. A confident wrong answer is much harder to walk back than an honest pause.
We can join the call as part of your team
For a conversation that genuinely needs an engineer in the room, we sit in presented as your technical lead — not as a second vendor logo the client now has to keep track of. The client sees one team on your side of the table, not a handoff between an account lead and a vendor.
You are never left guessing on your own
The point of the arrangement is that the depth is available to you whenever a client conversation needs it, not just during the hours we are actively building something. That's a small thing to promise and an easy one to notice when it's missing.
We keep a running list of what's likely to come up
Before a big client milestone, we flag the questions we'd expect a sharp client to ask and make sure you have real answers to them, not just hopeful ones.
Related
Related services
Other ways to get the build done, or a closer look at how the delivery model underneath this page actually works.
Questions
Questions
What teams ask before a first call.
No, unless you decide otherwise. Every project runs under NDA, deliverables carry your branding, and we do not contact the client without your sign-off. Even file metadata and email domains are set up so nothing traces back to us by accident.
If you want us on a call as your technical lead, we join that way — introduced by you, presented as part of your team, with no DEV.co name attached to the conversation.
Fixed price for a single, defined build; a monthly retainer when the work is recurring across the year. The table above breaks down both, along with an embedded pod for agencies with enough steady volume to justify one, and a scoping-only engagement for when you're not ready to commit to either.
Either way, the invoice goes to you. We do not bill the client directly, and we do not need to know what you charge them on top of it.
No. Most agencies hand us the creative brief they already wrote for the client, along with brand guidelines and whatever the client actually asked for, and we scope the build from that ourselves.
If a spec exists, we will use it. If it doesn't, that is the normal case, not a blocker — writing one from scratch, and asking the questions the brief doesn't answer, is part of what you are paying for.
We prep you with a plain-English answer before any meeting where it's likely to come up, and we would rather you tell the client 'let me confirm' than guess and have us correct it afterward. Ahead of a major milestone, we'll also flag the questions we'd expect a sharp client to ask before you're standing in front of them.
For conversations that genuinely need an engineer present, we can join the call introduced as part of your team, so the depth is there without adding a second vendor logo to the relationship.
Nothing happens — there is no retainer to cancel and no minimum to maintain if you only need us for one project. Fixed-price work carries no ongoing commitment once it ships, and a scoping engagement stands entirely on its own.
When the next build comes in, whether that's next month or next year, we scope it the same way we did the first one. Agencies with steadier volume tend to move to a retainer once the pattern is clear, but nothing forces that decision early.
Yes, when you want the technical depth in the room, introduced as part of your team rather than as DEV.co. That's your decision to make case by case, not a default we push for.
Most of the time it isn't necessary — you present the work, and we brief you beforehand so you can field the likely questions yourself and keep the meeting entirely yours.