indradb
IndraDB is a graph database written in Rust that stores vertices, edges, and JSON properties. It supports multiple deployment modes (in-memory, RocksDB, PostgreSQL) and can be accessed via gRPC for cross-language use or embedded directly in Rust applications.
Key facts
Objective fields from the source. Values we can't verify are shown as “Unknown” rather than guessed.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Repository | indradb/indradb |
| Owner | indradb |
| Primary language | Rust |
| License | MPL-2.0 — OSI-approved |
| Stars | 2.5k |
| Forks | 132 |
| Open issues | 17 |
| Latest release | v5.0.0 (2025-08-16) |
| Last updated | 2025-08-16 |
| Source | https://github.com/indradb/indradb |
What indradb is
IndraDB provides directed, typed graphs with multi-hop queries and property indexing, designed around TAO principles for scalability. It offers pluggable datastores (memory, RocksDB, PostgreSQL, sled), gRPC APIs, and a Rust library with no garbage collection overhead.
Get the indradb source
Clone the repository and explore it locally.
git clone https://github.com/indradb/indradb.gitcd indradb# follow the project's README for install & configurationNeed it deployed, integrated, or customized instead? DEV.co ships production installs.
Best use cases
Implementation considerations
- Choose datastore carefully: memory is fastest but non-durable; RocksDB balances speed and persistence; PostgreSQL offloads durability and may suit enterprise environments.
- Explicit syncing required for memory datastore; applications must call Sync() to persist data to disk.
- Rust library requires protobuf toolchain and gcc 5+ to build from source; pre-compiled binaries available for Linux/macOS.
- gRPC server runs on port 27615 by default; firewall and network topology must be configured for cross-language clients.
- Graph design must anticipate query patterns; indices on properties improve performance but add ingestion overhead.
When to avoid it — and what to weigh
- ACID transactions required — Memory and RocksDB datastores lack strong transactional guarantees; only PostgreSQL backend may offer that (requires separate evaluation).
- Full-graph analytics workloads — Not designed for iterative, compute-heavy graph algorithms; TAO-inspired design assumes full graph processing is infeasible.
- Schema flexibility needed — Typed, directed graph model with JSON properties is rigid; if your data model is highly heterogeneous or requires schema migration, this may constrain design.
- Production-grade HA/replication not available — No built-in replication or high-availability mode documented; single-server or manual replication setup required.
License & commercial use
Licensed under Mozilla Public License 2.0 (MPL-2.0), a weak copyleft license requiring modifications to the library itself to be open-sourced, but allowing proprietary applications that link or use it.
MPL-2.0 permits commercial use and proprietary applications. Requires review if you modify IndraDB source code directly (modifications must be disclosed); embedding or using via gRPC does not trigger copyleft. Consult legal counsel for specific deployment model.
DEV.co evaluation signals
Editorial assessment — not user reviews. Directional, with an explicit confidence level.
| Signal | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Maintenance | Active |
| Documentation | Adequate |
| License clarity | Clear |
| Deployment complexity | Moderate |
| DEV.co fit | Good |
| Assessment confidence | High |
gRPC server has no documented authentication/authorization layer by default; production deployment must add reverse proxy or network isolation. No security audit or CVE history visible in provided data. Rust language mitigates memory safety issues. Requires review of datastore-specific security (e.g., PostgreSQL access controls).
Alternatives to consider
Neo4j
Mature, feature-rich graph database with strong HA/clustering, ACID transactions, and Cypher query language; enterprise support available; trade-off is higher operational complexity and licensing cost.
ArangoDB
Multi-model database (graph, document, search); strong consistency options; good for polyglot deployments; more operational overhead than IndraDB.
TigerGraph
Purpose-built for graph analytics and iterative algorithms; stronger OLAP capabilities; significant licensing and operational investment required.
Build on indradb with DEV.co software developers
Assess whether IndraDB's TAO-inspired design and Rust performance fit your query patterns. Review datastore options (memory, RocksDB, PostgreSQL) and plan for authentication/HA in production. Contact Devco for architecture review.
Talk to DEV.coRelated open-source tools
Surfaced by semantic similarity across the DEV.co open-source index.
Related on DEV.co
Explore the category and the services that help you build with it.
indradb FAQ
Can I use IndraDB in production?
What query language does IndraDB use?
How large can a graph be?
Is authentication built-in?
Software development & web development with DEV.co
DEV.co helps companies turn open-source tools like indradb into production software. Our software development services cover the full lifecycle — architecture, web development, integration, and maintenance — delivered by software developers and web developers who ship. Engage our software development agency to implement or customize it for your open-source databases stack.
Evaluate IndraDB for Your Graph Workload
Assess whether IndraDB's TAO-inspired design and Rust performance fit your query patterns. Review datastore options (memory, RocksDB, PostgreSQL) and plan for authentication/HA in production. Contact Devco for architecture review.