cognee
Cognee is an open-source Python platform that gives AI agents persistent long-term memory by building and querying a self-hosted knowledge graph. It ingests data in multiple formats, combines vector embeddings with graph reasoning, and enables agents to recall and act on information across sessions.
Key facts
Objective fields from the source. Values we can't verify are shown as “Unknown” rather than guessed.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Repository | topoteretes/cognee |
| Owner | topoteretes |
| Primary language | Python |
| License | Apache-2.0 — OSI-approved |
| Stars | 27.3k |
| Forks | 2.5k |
| Open issues | 630 |
| Latest release | v1.2.2.dev4 (2026-07-07) |
| Last updated | 2026-07-07 |
| Source | https://github.com/topoteretes/cognee |
What cognee is
Cognee provides unified data ingestion, knowledge graph construction with ontology grounding, dual vector/graph search with auto-routing, and session memory caching. Built in Python with support for multiple LLM providers, vector databases, and graph backends (Neo4j, PostgreSQL/PGVector). Includes async APIs, CLI tools, and Docker deployment.
Get the cognee source
Clone the repository and explore it locally.
git clone https://github.com/topoteretes/cognee.gitcd cognee# follow the project's README for install & configurationNeed it deployed, integrated, or customized instead? DEV.co ships production installs.
Best use cases
Implementation considerations
- Choose backing storage (Neo4j vs PostgreSQL/PGVector) early; migration between graph backends is not documented.
- Plan LLM provider configuration upfront (OpenAI, others) and budget for embedding/synthesis API costs during ingestion and recall.
- Session memory caching syncs to persistent graph asynchronously; design error handling and eventual consistency expectations into agent logic.
- Ontology generation relies on LLM inference; document quality and schema evolution depend on prompt engineering and feedback loops.
- Scale testing and custom vector/graph indexes are not documented; run POCs with production-scale data volumes to validate performance.
When to avoid it — and what to weigh
- Fully Managed Cloud-Native Requirement — Cognee emphasizes self-hosted deployment. If your team requires SaaS with zero ops burden, the self-hosting requirement (even via Docker) adds operational overhead.
- Real-Time Performance at Massive Scale (Billions of Nodes) — No benchmark data provided on query latency or throughput at very large scales. Graph performance characteristics and indexing strategies are not documented.
- Strict Air-Gap or Offline-Only Environments — Requires external LLM API calls for memory synthesis and ontology grounding. No clear offline fallback or local model integration strategy is documented.
- Highly Regulated Compliance (SOC 2, FedRAMP) — No security audit, compliance certification, or data residency guarantees are documented. Audit trails mentioned but not detailed; requires thorough review before regulated use.
License & commercial use
Apache License 2.0 (Apache-2.0). Permissive OSI license permitting commercial use, modification, and distribution with no warranty or liability.
Apache 2.0 is a permissive OSI license that explicitly permits commercial use, including bundling into proprietary products, subject to attribution and license disclosure. No additional commercial license, SaaS restrictions, or per-seat fees are stated in the provided data. Verify derivative work and bundling terms with legal counsel if distributing as part of a commercial offering.
DEV.co evaluation signals
Editorial assessment — not user reviews. Directional, with an explicit confidence level.
| Signal | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Maintenance | Active |
| Documentation | Adequate |
| License clarity | Clear |
| Deployment complexity | Moderate |
| DEV.co fit | Good |
| Assessment confidence | High |
Audit trails and OTEL collector integration are mentioned but not detailed. No security audit, penetration test results, or CVE disclosure process documented. Multi-tenant isolation claims require review. LLM API keys and data stored in self-hosted graph require encryption at rest and in transit; no hardening guidance provided. Session memory and persistent graph separation may introduce side-channel risks if not carefully configured. Recommend threat modeling before production use in sensitive environments.
Alternatives to consider
LlamaIndex (formerly GPT Index)
Mature Python library for RAG with similar ingestion, indexing, and retrieval; tighter LLM integration but less graph-native reasoning; larger ecosystem but less agent memory focus.
Neo4j with LangChain
Combine Neo4j directly with LangChain agents for graph-native workflows; more flexibility but requires manual orchestration; no built-in ontology generation or session memory.
Weaviate or Pinecone (Vector-Only RAG)
Simpler, fully managed vector search; sufficient for keyword + semantic retrieval but no graph reasoning; lower operational overhead but limited for complex agent memory.
Build on cognee with DEV.co software developers
Start with the Colab quickstart or install via pip. Self-hosted, Apache 2.0 licensed, active community on Discord and Reddit.
Talk to DEV.coRelated on DEV.co
Explore the category and the services that help you build with it.
cognee FAQ
Can I use Cognee with proprietary LLMs (Claude, Gemini, Grok)?
Is Cognee suitable for production use today?
What is the minimum infrastructure to run Cognee?
How is multi-tenancy handled?
Custom software development services
DEV.co is a software development agency delivering custom software development services to companies building on open source. Our software developers and web developers design, integrate, and ship production systems — spanning web development, APIs, AI, data, and cloud. If cognee is part of your vector databases roadmap, our team can implement, customize, migrate, and maintain it.
Ready to Build Agent Memory?
Start with the Colab quickstart or install via pip. Self-hosted, Apache 2.0 licensed, active community on Discord and Reddit.