traceway
Traceway is an MIT-licensed, OpenTelemetry-native observability platform that ingests logs, traces, metrics, exceptions, and session replay through standard OTLP/HTTP endpoints. It runs self-hosted via Docker Compose or embedded in Go applications, with no external collector or vendor lock-in required.
Key facts
Objective fields from the source. Values we can't verify are shown as “Unknown” rather than guessed.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Repository | tracewayapp/traceway |
| Owner | tracewayapp |
| Primary language | Go |
| License | MIT — OSI-approved |
| Stars | 1k |
| Forks | 36 |
| Open issues | 14 |
| Latest release | cli/v1.8.14 (2026-07-02) |
| Last updated | 2026-07-08 |
| Source | https://github.com/tracewayapp/traceway |
What traceway is
Built on Go, Traceway natively accepts OTLP/HTTP telemetry and provides trace waterfalls, structured log search, per-endpoint metrics (P50/P95/P99, Apdex), exception grouping with source map/dSYM/R8 symbolication, experimental profiling (pprof/OTLP), and AI observability. Storage backend defaults to SQLite for embedded mode; production deployments use configurable backends. Ships CLI and OpenTelemetry Collector processor for standalone use.
Get the traceway source
Clone the repository and explore it locally.
git clone https://github.com/tracewayapp/traceway.gitcd traceway# follow the project's README for install & configurationNeed it deployed, integrated, or customized instead? DEV.co ships production installs.
Best use cases
Implementation considerations
- Ensure OpenTelemetry instrumentation already exists in backend (Go, Node, Python, etc.). If not, add OTel SDKs and exporters first—Traceway receives, not instruments.
- Plan storage backend: embedded SQLite works for exploration; production needs persistent volume, backups, and capacity planning per telemetry volume.
- Source map / dSYM / R8 mapping uploads must occur at or before exception ingest for symbolication. Coordinate CI/CD and upload tooling early.
- Multi-tenant and RBAC features require user/org setup post-deployment; authentication integration (OIDC, etc.) not detailed in data provided.
- Profiling is marked experimental; review stability and feature completeness before relying on it for production analysis.
When to avoid it — and what to weigh
- Requiring multi-language backend SDKs beyond OTel — Traceway relies entirely on OpenTelemetry; if your stack lacks mature OTel support, you'll need to instrument via OTel first or build custom exporters.
- Expecting zero operational overhead — While Docker Compose setup is fast, production self-hosting requires storage, backup, and scaling decisions. Not a managed SaaS-only offering with hands-off operations.
- Mission-critical production without vendor SLA — Project created 2025-12-18 with ~1K GitHub stars. OSS community support model; no commercial support contract or SLA available from data provided.
- Existing enterprise Datadog/New Relic integrations — Replacing established vendor observability stacks requires migration effort; no bulk data import or federation documented.
License & commercial use
MIT License (100% Open Source, per README). No BSL, no open-core model. All features included in source. Permissive OSI license allows modification and redistribution.
MIT License is permissive for commercial use. However, no commercial support contract, SLA, or vendor backing is documented. Self-hosted commercial deployments require your own ops. Traceway Cloud offering exists but terms not provided in data. Legal review recommended for production enterprise deployments.
DEV.co evaluation signals
Editorial assessment — not user reviews. Directional, with an explicit confidence level.
| Signal | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Maintenance | Active |
| Documentation | Adequate |
| License clarity | Clear |
| Deployment complexity | Low |
| DEV.co fit | Strong |
| Assessment confidence | High |
Docker images are cryptographically signed with Cosign (stated in README). Authentication and RBAC exist but details sparse. Self-hosted deployments inherit OS and network security burden. No security audit, CVE history, or threat model provided. OTLP/HTTP endpoints should be protected (TLS, auth) in production. Review code independently for sensitive deployments.
Alternatives to consider
Datadog / New Relic
Enterprise observability with commercial SLA and dedicated support. Proprietary pricing (per-event, per-host, per-seat) and vendor SDKs. Includes replay, APM, profiling. Higher cost and lock-in; Traceway avoids both.
Grafana Stack (Prometheus + Loki + Tempo + Pyroscope)
Open-source DIY approach. Lower cost but requires gluing 6+ tools, OTel Collector setup, and ops overhead. Traceway offers integrated UX and native OTLP ingest without collector.
Honeycomb
High-cardinality observability, excellent trace UI, OTel-first. SaaS pricing and vendor dependency. Traceway offers self-hosting option and MIT license; Honeycomb does not.
Build on traceway with DEV.co software developers
Deploy Traceway self-hosted for free with docker compose, or try Traceway Cloud. Join the community on Discord to get started.
Talk to DEV.coRelated open-source tools
Surfaced by semantic similarity across the DEV.co open-source index.
Related on DEV.co
Explore the category and the services that help you build with it.
traceway FAQ
Do I need an OpenTelemetry Collector?
Can I embed Traceway in my Go application?
Is source map / dSYM symbolication automatic?
What SLA or support does the project offer?
Work with a software development agency
DEV.co helps companies turn open-source tools like traceway into production software. Our software development services cover the full lifecycle — architecture, web development, integration, and maintenance — delivered by software developers and web developers who ship. Engage our software development agency to implement or customize it for your open-source observability stack.
Start observing your stack today
Deploy Traceway self-hosted for free with docker compose, or try Traceway Cloud. Join the community on Discord to get started.