pyrra
Pyrra is an open-source platform that simplifies Service Level Objective (SLO) management for Prometheus-based monitoring. It provides a web UI, API, and Kubernetes Operator to define, track, and alert on SLOs with automatic burn-rate alerting and error budget visualization.
Key facts
Objective fields from the source. Values we can't verify are shown as “Unknown” rather than guessed.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Repository | pyrra-dev/pyrra |
| Owner | pyrra-dev |
| Primary language | Go |
| License | Apache-2.0 — OSI-approved |
| Stars | 1.5k |
| Forks | 148 |
| Open issues | 83 |
| Latest release | v0.10.1 (2026-06-25) |
| Last updated | 2026-07-02 |
| Source | https://github.com/pyrra-dev/pyrra |
What pyrra is
Go-based tool that generates Prometheus recording rules from YAML-defined SLOs and exposes them via a web UI with PromQL integration. Supports Kubernetes Operators, Docker/filesystem modes, Thanos backends, and Grafana dashboards; queries metrics through Prometheus HTTP API with optional basic auth, bearer tokens, and multi-tenant Mimir support.
Get the pyrra source
Clone the repository and explore it locally.
git clone https://github.com/pyrra-dev/pyrra.gitcd pyrra# follow the project's README for install & configurationNeed it deployed, integrated, or customized instead? DEV.co ships production installs.
Best use cases
Implementation considerations
- Requires Prometheus instance with HTTP API access; confirm network/firewall rules and authentication (basic auth or bearer token) before deployment.
- SLO definitions are YAML-based and version-controlled; plan YAML schema validation, GitOps workflow, and change review process to avoid misconfigured recording rules.
- Kubernetes deployments require Prometheus Operator or ConfigMap mode; non-Operator setups need manual Prometheus config updates to ingest generated recording rules.
- Multi-burn-rate alerting generates 8 recording rules per SLO; confirm Prometheus cardinality limits and storage overhead, especially at scale (>100 SLOs).
- UI caching and Thanos downsampling (5m, 1h) are built in; test query latency and accuracy tradeoffs with your Prometheus retention and cardinality.
When to avoid it — and what to weigh
- Not using Prometheus for metrics collection — Pyrra is tightly coupled to Prometheus; it requires a running Prometheus instance to query and generate recording rules. Non-Prometheus stacks (e.g., Datadog, New Relic native) are not supported.
- Need for complex, non-PromQL SLO definitions — SLOs are constrained to PromQL-compatible ratio and threshold models; if your SLO logic requires custom aggregation, external data, or non-metric signals, Pyrra's declarative model may be limiting.
- Require RBAC or multi-tenancy at the SLO level — Pyrra does not expose explicit per-SLO access control in the documentation; if you need fine-grained RBAC or strong SLO-level isolation across tenants, requires review of current capabilities.
- Production use without operational maturity review — While active (v0.10.1 as of June 2026), 83 open issues and lack of documented SLA/support model suggest pilots should validate stability, backup/restore, and upgrade procedures before critical dependencies.
License & commercial use
Licensed under Apache License 2.0 (Apache-2.0), a permissive OSI-approved license. Source code, binaries, and derivative works are available; no commercial restrictions documented in the license itself.
Apache-2.0 permits commercial use, modification, and distribution. However, no explicit commercial support model, SLA, or vendor backing is stated in provided materials. Organizations should clarify support expectations (community-only vs. commercial sponsor) before production deployment.
DEV.co evaluation signals
Editorial assessment — not user reviews. Directional, with an explicit confidence level.
| Signal | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Maintenance | Active |
| Documentation | Adequate |
| License clarity | Clear |
| Deployment complexity | Moderate |
| DEV.co fit | Good |
| Assessment confidence | High |
Pyrra does not implement SLO-level RBAC; all users with UI access see all SLOs. Prometheus access can be protected via basic auth or bearer token. TLS support for Prometheus client connections via `--tls-client-ca-file`. No audit logging, secrets management, or encryption-at-rest documented. Consider network-level isolation and Kubernetes NetworkPolicies for multi-tenant environments.
Alternatives to consider
Prometheus Alertmanager + custom PromQL rules
Minimal SLO abstraction; define burn-rate rules directly in Prometheus config. Lower overhead but requires manual rule tuning and no standardized UI/API for SLO browsing.
Commercial SLO platforms (Datadog SLO, New Relic SLO, Nobl9)
Vendor-managed SLO definition, multi-source metrics, and commercial support. Trade open-source flexibility and cost for managed UX and broader integration.
Sloth (SLO generator for Prometheus)
Lightweight Python-based SLO-to-recording-rules generator; no UI or API server. Simpler and more portable, but lacks visualization and team collaboration features.
Build on pyrra with DEV.co software developers
Explore Pyrra's live demo, review Kubernetes and Docker deployment examples, and evaluate fit for your error budget tracking and alerting strategy.
Talk to DEV.coRelated open-source tools
Surfaced by semantic similarity across the DEV.co open-source index.
Related on DEV.co
Explore the category and the services that help you build with it.
pyrra FAQ
Can Pyrra run without Kubernetes?
What does Pyrra generate from an SLO definition?
Does Pyrra send alerts, or just track error budgets?
Is there multi-tenancy support?
Software development & web development with DEV.co
Need help beyond evaluating pyrra? DEV.co is a software development agency offering software development services and web development for teams of every size. Our software developers and web developers build custom software, web applications, APIs, and open-source observability integrations — and maintain them long-term.
Streamline SLO Management for Your Prometheus Stack
Explore Pyrra's live demo, review Kubernetes and Docker deployment examples, and evaluate fit for your error budget tracking and alerting strategy.