AI ERP with agents inside the systems you run
AI phone and voice agents for real calls
LLM.coPrivate, self-hosted LLM deployments
Legal AI infrastructure for firms
AI RFP discovery and response drafting
Automatic.coBusiness process automation
CyberAttack.aiThreat detection and defense
Secure AI virtual data roomsopenstatus
Openstatus is an open-source platform that combines status page publishing with uptime monitoring across 28 global regions. It offers both managed and self-hosted deployment options with monitoring-as-code capabilities via YAML, CLI, and GitHub Actions.
Key facts
Objective fields from the source. Values we can't verify are shown as “Unknown” rather than guessed.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Repository | openstatusHQ/openstatus |
| Owner | openstatusHQ |
| Primary language | TypeScript |
| License | AGPL-3.0 — OSI-approved |
| Stars | 8.8k |
| Forks | 696 |
| Open issues | 59 |
| Latest release | Unknown |
| Last updated | 2026-07-07 |
| Source | https://github.com/openstatusHQ/openstatus |
What openstatus is
Built on Next.js, Hono, Go, Turso, Drizzle ORM, and Tinybird, openstatus provides synthetic monitoring, incident communication, and status page rendering. Self-hosting uses containerized architecture (Docker/Coolify) with private location checkers deployable as 8.5MB images.
Get the openstatus source
Clone the repository and explore it locally.
git clone https://github.com/openstatusHQ/openstatus.gitcd openstatus# follow the project's README for install & configurationNeed it deployed, integrated, or customized instead? DEV.co ships production installs.
Best use cases
Implementation considerations
- AGPL-3.0 license: Any self-hosted modifications that are exposed over a network may trigger copyleft obligations. Legal review recommended before internal deployment.
- Microservice architecture: Deployment involves multiple Docker images (server, dashboard, workflows, checker, status page, private-location). Orchestration and networking complexity increases with scale.
- Data backend: Turso (SQLite) and Tinybird (analytics) are external dependencies. Assess vendor lock-in and alternative storage strategies if considering air-gapped deployments.
- Checker infrastructure: Go-based checker runs in private locations. Monitoring from 28 cloud regions in managed service; self-hosted deployments must manage regional checkers separately.
- No official release version: Latest release is 'n/a'; last push was 2026-07-07 (future-dated, likely clock error). Assess stability and update cadence before production commitment.
When to avoid it — and what to weigh
- Requiring commercial license with no copyleft obligations — Openstatus uses AGPL-3.0, which mandates source disclosure for networked modifications. Commercial use requires careful review of whether derivative works must be open-sourced.
- Need for guaranteed SLA or enterprise support contract — No official release cadence, SLA commitments, or enterprise support model visible in the data. Enterprise inquiries are directed to email; support structure is unknown.
- Expecting minimal operational overhead — Self-hosting requires managing Node.js ≥20, pnpm, Bun, Turso, and multiple microservices (server, dashboard, workflows, checker, status page). Docker Compose eases this but still non-trivial.
- Low-latency, sub-second incident detection — No latency or detection SLA specifications provided. Monitoring from 28 regions implies network-bound checks; real-time incident response expectations require verification.
License & commercial use
Licensed under AGPL-3.0 (GNU Affero General Public License v3.0). This is a strong copyleft license requiring that any modified versions distributed or exposed over a network must provide source code access to users. Commercial use is not explicitly prohibited, but derivative works carry copyleft obligations.
AGPL-3.0 allows commercial use but mandates source disclosure for networked modifications. If you modify openstatus and deploy it as a service, you must offer source to users. Pure self-hosting without modifications is less restrictive, but any customization requires legal review. Enterprise inquiries are directed to [email protected]; a commercial license or exception may be available but is unknown from this data.
DEV.co evaluation signals
Editorial assessment — not user reviews. Directional, with an explicit confidence level.
| Signal | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Maintenance | Active |
| Documentation | Adequate |
| License clarity | Clear |
| Deployment complexity | Moderate |
| DEV.co fit | Good |
| Assessment confidence | Medium |
No explicit security audit, vulnerability disclosure policy, or hardening guidelines mentioned in the data. Self-hosting introduces supply-chain risk (Node.js, Go, Turso dependencies). AGPL-3.0 source availability is a transparency control. Checker agents running in private locations should be isolated from sensitive infrastructure. No mention of TLS enforcement, secret rotation, or compliance frameworks (SOC 2, ISO 27001). Assess against your threat model and regulatory requirements.
Alternatives to consider
Uptime Kuma
Open-source uptime monitoring with status page. Simpler stack (Node.js + SQLite), permissive MIT license, lower deployment complexity. Lacks global regions and monitoring-as-code.
Statuses (or similar SaaS)
Managed status page + monitoring services (Atlassian, Squadcast, etc.). No self-hosting, no copyleft licensing, vendor-managed infrastructure. Higher cost per seat/subscriber.
Prometheus + Alertmanager + Grafana
Open-source observability stack with permissive Apache 2.0/AGPL licenses. Mature, widely adopted, highly customizable. Steeper learning curve, requires deeper DevOps expertise.
Build on openstatus with DEV.co software developers
Review the AGPL-3.0 licensing terms, assess self-hosting complexity, and validate global monitoring coverage against your SLA requirements. Contact the team at [email protected] for enterprise licensing or custom feature inquiries.
Talk to DEV.coRelated on DEV.co
Explore the category and the services that help you build with it.
openstatus FAQ
Can I use openstatus commercially?
What is the difference between managed and self-hosted?
How does monitoring-as-code work?
What is the production readiness of openstatus?
Build it with a software development company
Pairing openstatus with the rest of your stack is where most open-source observability projects stall. DEV.co is a software development agency that does the integration work — plus AI development when models are in scope.
Ready to Deploy Openstatus?
Review the AGPL-3.0 licensing terms, assess self-hosting complexity, and validate global monitoring coverage against your SLA requirements. Contact the team at [email protected] for enterprise licensing or custom feature inquiries.