AI ERP with agents inside the systems you run
AI phone and voice agents for real calls
LLM.coPrivate, self-hosted LLM deployments
Legal AI infrastructure for firms
AI RFP discovery and response drafting
Automatic.coBusiness process automation
CyberAttack.aiThreat detection and defense
Secure AI virtual data roomsopendevops
CODO (CloudOpenDevOps) is an open-source, multi-cloud DevOps and automation operations platform built with Python Tornado and Go. It provides CMDB, task scheduling, Kubernetes management, and cross-region cloud resource orchestration via a web UI and microservices architecture.
Key facts
Objective fields from the source. Values we can't verify are shown as “Unknown” rather than guessed.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Repository | opendevops-cn/opendevops |
| Owner | opendevops-cn |
| Primary language | Python |
| License | GPL-3.0 — OSI-approved |
| Stars | 4.1k |
| Forks | 1k |
| Open issues | 53 |
| Latest release | Unknown |
| Last updated | 2026-04-12 |
| Source | https://github.com/opendevops-cn/opendevops |
What opendevops is
Backend uses Python 3.9 Tornado 6.0 and Go 1.23; frontend built on Vue.js 2.5 with iView and React with Ant Design; API gateway via OpenResty + Lua; microservices with modular architecture (codo-admin, codo-cmdb, codo-flow, codo-cnmp, etc.); deployment via Docker Compose or Kubernetes Helm.
Get the opendevops source
Clone the repository and explore it locally.
git clone https://github.com/opendevops-cn/opendevops.gitcd opendevops# follow the project's README for install & configurationNeed it deployed, integrated, or customized instead? DEV.co ships production installs.
Best use cases
Implementation considerations
- Requires Python 3.9+ and Go 1.23 runtime; deployment via Docker Compose (simple) or Kubernetes Helm (moderate infrastructure overhead).
- Modular architecture means multiple repositories and services must be orchestrated; ensure deployment tooling (Docker, K8s) and container registry are in place.
- Database backend (MySQL/PostgreSQL) and message broker (Redis likely, not explicitly stated) required; plan HA and backup strategy.
- OpenResty + Lua gateway demands understanding of reverse proxy configuration and Lua scripting for customization.
- Microservices approach requires monitoring, logging, and inter-service communication debugging; platform observability must be planned.
When to avoid it — and what to weigh
- No Recent Major Release History — Latest release marked as 'n/a'; last code push 2026-04-12 but no tagged releases visible. May indicate long release cycles or incomplete release documentation.
- GPL-3.0 License Restrictions — GPL-3.0 requires derivative works to be open-source and published under same license. Proprietary or closed-source modifications trigger copyleft obligations; requires legal review for commercial deployments.
- Limited English Documentation — README and community resources predominantly in Chinese. English docs and video tutorials sparse; onboarding may be challenging for non-Mandarin teams.
- Active but Niche Community — 4,089 stars and 1,034 forks indicate adoption, but no clear commercial backing, SLA, or enterprise support model documented. Community via QQ groups; no official support channels stated.
License & commercial use
GPL-3.0 (GNU General Public License v3.0). This is a copyleft license requiring source code publication for any distributed derivative works.
GPL-3.0 permits internal use without publication. However, distributing modified versions (as SaaS, appliance, or derivative product) triggers copyleft: you must publish source under GPL-3.0. Commercial support, proprietary modules, or licensing exceptions are not documented. Any for-profit use of modifications requires legal review and likely source disclosure. No commercial license or dual-licensing model stated.
DEV.co evaluation signals
Editorial assessment — not user reviews. Directional, with an explicit confidence level.
| Signal | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Maintenance | Moderate |
| Documentation | Adequate |
| License clarity | Clear |
| Deployment complexity | High |
| DEV.co fit | Good |
| Assessment confidence | Medium |
No explicit security audit, vulnerability disclosure process, or security.txt documented. Running as container requires standard supply-chain verification (image signing, registry authentication). GPL-3.0 source review possible; assess codebase for secrets management, RBAC implementation, SQL injection, and CSRF handling before production use. Microservices require inter-service auth (not detailed). Demo instance shows basic auth (demo/password); review authentication integration for enterprise SSO/LDAP needs. No mention of encryption at rest or TLS enforcement.
Alternatives to consider
Ansible AWX / Automation Platform
Red Hat–backed, GPL-2.0, more mature community and commercial support; stronger for pure automation and playbook-centric workflows but weaker on CMDB and multi-cloud inventory.
Rundeck
Apache 2.0 license, lighter-weight job scheduler and runbook platform; less comprehensive CMDB/ITSM but simpler to deploy and operate for small teams.
OpsGenie / PagerDuty + Terraform
Commercial SaaS with strong incident response; Terraform for IaC; not open-source but mature support, integrations, and compliance certifications reduce implementation risk for enterprises.
Build on opendevops with DEV.co software developers
Review the GPL-3.0 license terms, test-drive the demo, and assess deployment complexity for your team. Engage legal if commercial modifications are planned. Contact us to scope implementation and integration needs.
Talk to DEV.coRelated on DEV.co
Explore the category and the services that help you build with it.
opendevops FAQ
Can we use CODO in a proprietary product without open-sourcing modifications?
Is there commercial support or SLA?
How do we integrate CODO with existing monitoring (Prometheus, DataDog)?
What databases are supported?
Custom software development services
Bringing opendevops into production usually means new services, new interfaces, and new failure modes. DEV.co is a software development agency that builds all three and stays on for the open-source devops maintenance.
Ready to Evaluate CODO for Your Infrastructure?
Review the GPL-3.0 license terms, test-drive the demo, and assess deployment complexity for your team. Engage legal if commercial modifications are planned. Contact us to scope implementation and integration needs.