DEV.co
Open-Source DevOps · upgundecha

howtheysre

How They SRE is a curated knowledge repository documenting Site Reliability Engineering practices, tools, and culture from leading technology organizations. It aggregates publicly shared insights from engineering blogs, conferences, and meetups across topics like monitoring, incident response, chaos engineering, and on-call management.

Source: GitHub — github.com/upgundecha/howtheysre
9.8k
GitHub stars
887
Forks
JavaScript
Primary language
CC0-1.0
License (Requires review (not clearly OSI))

Key facts

Objective fields from the source. Values we can't verify are shown as “Unknown” rather than guessed.

FieldValue
Repositoryupgundecha/howtheysre
Ownerupgundecha
Primary languageJavaScript
LicenseCC0-1.0 — Requires review (not clearly OSI)
Stars9.8k
Forks887
Open issues11
Latest releaseUnknown
Last updated2025-11-17
Sourcehttps://github.com/upgundecha/howtheysre

What howtheysre is

A community-maintained knowledge base (JavaScript/web format) indexing SRE methodologies, architectural patterns, and operational practices from organizations including Airbnb, Atlassian, and Bloomberg. Content spans alerting frameworks, Kubernetes scaling, observability, incident postmortems, and chaos engineering approaches.

Quickstart

Get the howtheysre source

Clone the repository and explore it locally.

terminalbash
git clone https://github.com/upgundecha/howtheysre.gitcd howtheysre# follow the project's README for install & configuration

Need it deployed, integrated, or customized instead? DEV.co ships production installs.

Best use cases

SRE Team Onboarding & Culture Building

New SRE teams can reference real-world case studies and best practices from established organizations to design incident response workflows, on-call rotations, and reliability culture. Useful for teams establishing SRE discipline from scratch.

Observability & Monitoring Strategy

Teams designing monitoring and alerting frameworks can reference Airbnb's alerting architecture, Baidu's anomaly detection, and Bloomberg's distributed tracing approaches to inform tool selection and alert design.

Incident Response & Postmortem Process Design

Organizations can study blameless postmortem templates, incident escalation reduction tactics (Basecamp), and automated incident management patterns to formalize their own incident response playbooks.

Implementation considerations

  • Content is curated from external sources (blogs, conferences, videos); verify practices against your organizational context before adoption.
  • Topics span infrastructure (Kubernetes, cloud), monitoring tools (varied), and process (incident response, on-call)—use as reference, not prescriptive.
  • Examples come from large-scale organizations (Airbnb, Alibaba, Bloomberg); patterns may require adaptation for smaller teams or different maturity levels.
  • No standardized framework is enforced; select practices relevant to your tech stack and incident volume.
  • Resources are self-curated by maintainer(s); completeness and recency of coverage varies by topic and organization.

When to avoid it — and what to weigh

  • Need Executable Code or Tools — This is a curated reference and knowledge repository, not a software toolkit or runnable framework. It links to external resources but does not provide code implementations to deploy directly.
  • Seeking Vendor-Specific Solutions — The collection is tool-agnostic and focuses on principles and practices. If you need a specific monitoring platform, incident management system, or CI/CD tool, use vendor documentation instead.
  • Require Real-Time Operational Data — Content is static case studies and blog posts. For live metrics, alerts, or dashboards, use operational monitoring platforms (Prometheus, DataDog, etc.) instead.
  • Need Proprietary or Confidential Details — Repository contains only publicly available information. Sensitive internal practices, compliance frameworks, or proprietary architectures are not included.

License & commercial use

CC0-1.0 (Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal) allows unrestricted use, modification, and distribution without attribution requirements. Content is public domain equivalent.

CC0-1.0 permits commercial use without restriction. However, this applies to the repository content and curation only. External resources linked (blog posts, videos, conference talks) retain their original licenses and terms—verify those before commercial reuse. The repository itself carries no licensing restrictions on redistribution or derivative use.

DEV.co evaluation signals

Editorial assessment — not user reviews. Directional, with an explicit confidence level.

SignalAssessment
MaintenanceActive
DocumentationStrong
License clarityClear
Deployment complexityLow
DEV.co fitGood
Assessment confidenceHigh
Security considerations

Repository itself poses minimal security risk—it is a static knowledge base. However: (1) external links may become stale or compromised; verify sources before implementing; (2) practices from other organizations may not suit your threat model or compliance requirements; (3) no security audit framework is provided—use this to inform decisions, not as security compliance documentation; (4) code snippets or tools referenced externally should be reviewed for vulnerabilities before production use.

Alternatives to consider

Cloud-Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) Landscape & Docs

Provides tools and architectures for Kubernetes, observability, and cloud-native SRE. More implementation-focused than How They SRE, but narrower scope (primarily cloud-native stack).

SRE Book (Google) & Workbook

Foundational SRE theory and practices from Google. More authoritative and prescriptive than a curated collection, but less contemporary organization case studies.

Platform Engineering Community (CNCF, Gartner)

Focuses on platform teams and infrastructure automation. Overlaps with SRE practices but emphasizes internal developer platforms vs. broader reliability culture.

Software development agency

Build on howtheysre with DEV.co software developers

Explore real-world SRE strategies from leading organizations. Use How They SRE to guide your team's reliability culture, incident response, and observability design.

Talk to DEV.co

Related open-source tools

Surfaced by semantic similarity across the DEV.co open-source index.

howtheysre FAQ

Can I use this repository commercially?
Yes. CC0-1.0 permits commercial use of the repository itself. However, the *external resources linked* (blog posts, videos, conference talks) may have different licenses—always verify the original source's terms.
Is this a software tool or library I can install?
No. How They SRE is a curated knowledge index and reference collection. It does not provide executable code, APIs, or deployment artifacts. Use it to inform decisions about which tools and practices to adopt.
How frequently is the repository updated?
Active. Last update was November 2025. The maintainer curates new content as organizations publish SRE insights. Check the GitHub repo for recent additions and open issues.
Are practices suitable for my organization?
Practices come from large-scale organizations (Airbnb, Alibaba, Bloomberg). Evaluate whether case studies match your scale, tech stack, and incident load before adopting. Use as reference, not prescription.

Work with a software development agency

Need help beyond evaluating howtheysre? DEV.co is a software development agency offering software development services and web development for teams of every size. Our software developers and web developers build custom software, web applications, APIs, and open-source devops integrations — and maintain them long-term.

Build Reliable Systems with SRE Best Practices

Explore real-world SRE strategies from leading organizations. Use How They SRE to guide your team's reliability culture, incident response, and observability design.