DevSecOps
DevSecOps is a curated collection and roadmap repository that documents DevSecOps practices, tools, and resources across the software development lifecycle. It serves as an educational reference for teams adopting security-integrated development, covering design through operations phases.
Key facts
Objective fields from the source. Values we can't verify are shown as “Unknown” rather than guessed.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Repository | hahwul/DevSecOps |
| Owner | hahwul |
| Primary language | Just |
| License | MIT — OSI-approved |
| Stars | 2.1k |
| Forks | 426 |
| Open issues | 0 |
| Latest release | Unknown |
| Last updated | 2026-06-30 |
| Source | https://github.com/hahwul/DevSecOps |
What DevSecOps is
A GitHub-hosted roadmap project (MIT-licensed) that aggregates DevSecOps frameworks (SDL, SAMM, BSIMM, NIST SSDF), threat modeling guidance, SAST/DAST testing approaches, CI/CD security patterns, and a structured tools list. Content spans secure coding, secret management, component analysis, and infrastructure hardening.
Get the DevSecOps source
Clone the repository and explore it locally.
git clone https://github.com/hahwul/DevSecOps.gitcd DevSecOps# follow the project's README for install & configurationNeed it deployed, integrated, or customized instead? DEV.co ships production installs.
Best use cases
Implementation considerations
- Use the roadmap as a **reference architecture**—adapt the phases (Design → Develop → Build → Test → Deploy → Operate) to your organization's existing SDLC, not as a rigid template.
- Prioritize **'shift left' practices** early (threat modeling, secure coding, SAST in build) before investing heavily in runtime (DAST, monitoring) to maximize security ROI.
- Establish **cross-functional ownership**—this resource is educational; successful adoption requires buy-in from dev, security, and ops teams with clear responsibility assignments.
- Supplement with **org-specific context**—the resource links to frameworks (OWASP SAMM, NIST SSDF) but does not prescribe industry or compliance-specific policies (e.g., PCI DSS, HIPAA) you must layer on.
- Treat the **tools list as a starting inventory**—you will need to evaluate, vet, and integrate selected tools with your CI/CD, container, and infrastructure platforms.
When to avoid it — and what to weigh
- Looking for production-grade security automation — This is a reference/educational repository, not a turnkey platform. It does not provide CI/CD pipeline templates, container scanning SaaS, or managed security services—only guidance and tool pointers.
- Seeking hands-on labs or executable examples — The project is documentation and links; there are no sample code repositories, Docker Compose files, or interactive labs to practice the concepts. You must source or build learning environments separately.
- Expecting vendor-neutral comparisons with benchmarks — The tools list includes commercial and open-source options without performance benchmarks, licensing cost analysis, or head-to-head comparisons. Evaluation requires independent testing and vendor consultation.
- Needing compliance automation or audit trails — This is a resource collection, not a GRC (governance, risk, compliance) platform. It does not generate audit reports, track remediation workflows, or integrate with compliance management systems.
License & commercial use
Licensed under the MIT License (OSI permissive). You may use, modify, and distribute this material for any purpose (commercial or otherwise) provided you retain the original license notice and copyright attribution.
MIT is a permissive open-source license that permits commercial use, modification, and redistribution with attribution. You may use this roadmap as a reference for selling DevSecOps consulting, training, or managed services. However, the repository itself is a collection of curated links and educational content, not a proprietary tool or software product—commercial value comes from your implementation and integration of recommended practices and tools, not from licensing restrictions.
DEV.co evaluation signals
Editorial assessment — not user reviews. Directional, with an explicit confidence level.
| Signal | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Maintenance | Active |
| Documentation | Strong |
| License clarity | Clear |
| Deployment complexity | Low |
| DEV.co fit | Good |
| Assessment confidence | High |
This repository is a **curated reference, not a security control**. Security depends entirely on implementation choices you make based on its guidance. Review: (1) Source credibility of linked resources—many are reputable (OWASP, NIST, Microsoft, MITRE) but verify applicability to your threat model. (2) Tool selection—not all recommended tools have equivalent security properties; evaluate CVE history, maintainer trust, and integration security for each. (3) Policy enforcement—the roadmap does not enforce compliance; you must establish and audit DevSecOps policies independently. (4) Sensitive data—do not store secrets, PII, or threat intelligence in this public repository when referencing or extending it.
Alternatives to consider
OWASP Top 10 / OWASP Secure Coding Practices
Narrower focus on application vulnerability categories and secure coding principles rather than end-to-end DevSecOps lifecycle. Better for developers seeking specific threat mitigations; less useful for ops/infrastructure security planning.
NIST Cybersecurity Framework / NIST SSDF
Authoritative government standards (compliance-relevant for critical infrastructure, federal contractors). More prescriptive and formal but less curated for agile/DevOps contexts; requires custom mapping to SDLC stages.
Commercial DevSecOps platforms (Snyk, Checkov, GitGuardian, GitHub Advanced Security)
Integrated, managed solutions with automation, dashboards, and vendor support. Trade ease-of-use and orchestration for cost and vendor dependency; no educational roadmap, only tool-specific documentation.
Build on DevSecOps with DEV.co software developers
Use this roadmap to assess your current DevSecOps maturity, identify tool gaps, and prioritize security practices across design, build, test, and deployment. Fork the repository, reference the frameworks (OWASP, NIST, BSIMM), and customize for your organization.
Talk to DEV.coRelated on DEV.co
Explore the category and the services that help you build with it.
DevSecOps FAQ
Is DevSecOps a tool or a practice?
Can I use this roadmap for regulatory compliance (PCI DSS, HIPAA, ISO 27001)?
Does this repository include CI/CD pipeline templates or code examples?
How often is the repository updated, and is it reliable for current best practices?
Software development & web development with DEV.co
Need help beyond evaluating DevSecOps? DEV.co is a software development agency offering software development services and web development for teams of every size. Our software developers and web developers build custom software, web applications, APIs, and open-source devops integrations — and maintain them long-term.
Build a DevSecOps Strategy for Your Team
Use this roadmap to assess your current DevSecOps maturity, identify tool gaps, and prioritize security practices across design, build, test, and deployment. Fork the repository, reference the frameworks (OWASP, NIST, BSIMM), and customize for your organization.