LLM.coPrivate, self-hosted LLM deployments
Legal AI infrastructure for firms
AI RFP discovery and response drafting
Automatic.coBusiness process automation
Secure AI virtual data rooms1backend
1Backend is a self-hosted, AI-native platform for building microservices and microfrontends without early infrastructure overhead. It handles authentication, multi-tenancy, routing, and LLM execution in containers, designed as a distributed operating system for applications.
Key facts
Objective fields from the source. Values we can't verify are shown as “Unknown” rather than guessed.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Repository | 1backend/1backend |
| Owner | 1backend |
| Primary language | Go |
| License | AGPL-3.0 — OSI-approved |
| Stars | 2.3k |
| Forks | 117 |
| Open issues | 1 |
| Latest release | v0.9.0 (2025-10-12) |
| Last updated | 2026-05-27 |
| Source | https://github.com/1backend/1backend |
What 1backend is
Go-based full-stack framework providing service registry, API gateway, authentication, multi-tenant routing, containerized LLM support, and built-in ORM. Exposes services via HTTP routing with SDK support for Go and JavaScript; supports Docker-based deployment with configurable edge proxy and SSL.
Get the 1backend source
Clone the repository and explore it locally.
git clone https://github.com/1backend/1backend.gitcd 1backend# follow the project's README for install & configurationNeed it deployed, integrated, or customized instead? DEV.co ships production installs.
Best use cases
Implementation considerations
- AGPL-3.0 license: any modifications or network use must have source code disclosed to users; review licensing implications before deployment.
- Pre-1.0 release (v0.9.0): API stability and breaking changes possible; evaluate changelog and roadmap for compatibility concerns.
- Docker-based deployment required; self-hosting infrastructure (compute, networking, SSL) is responsibility of operator.
- Service account/credential model requires each microservice to manage its own auth; integration with existing identity systems (LDAP, OIDC) not clearly documented.
- Built-in ORM locks you into 1Backend data layer; migration complexity if future database switching is needed.
When to avoid it — and what to weigh
- Commercial closed-source deployments requiring permissive licensing — AGPL-3.0 requires disclosure of source code and modifications to all users. Proprietary use requires careful review or commercial licensing arrangement (Unknown if available).
- Mature production environments requiring stable, long-term support — Latest release is v0.9.0 (pre-1.0). Active development is evident, but stability guarantees and enterprise SLA commitments are not stated.
- Organizations with strict lock-in avoidance on data stores — Platform includes custom ORM; dependency on 1Backend's data abstraction layer may complicate future migration or multi-database strategies.
- Small teams without DevOps capacity or container expertise — Requires Docker, understanding of microservice patterns, and manual server configuration. No managed cloud offering mentioned; self-hosting burden is significant.
License & commercial use
Licensed under AGPL-3.0 (GNU Affero General Public License v3.0). This is a copyleft license requiring source code disclosure to all network users and licensees. Any modifications must be shared under the same license.
AGPL-3.0 is not a permissive OSI license suitable for closed-source commercial products without source disclosure. Internal/on-premise use may be allowed, but any SaaS or network-exposed derivative requires source release. Commercial licensing or exceptions: Unknown—requires direct contact with maintainers.
DEV.co evaluation signals
Editorial assessment — not user reviews. Directional, with an explicit confidence level.
| Signal | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Maintenance | Active |
| Documentation | Adequate |
| License clarity | Clear |
| Deployment complexity | Moderate |
| DEV.co fit | Good |
| Assessment confidence | Medium |
Platform claims zero-trust architecture and built-in auth/multi-tenancy. No third-party security audit, penetration test results, or vulnerability disclosure policy mentioned. Self-hosting security posture depends entirely on operator's infrastructure hardening. AGPL-3.0 source availability aids review but does not guarantee secure design. Service credential management model requires careful operational discipline.
Alternatives to consider
Kubernetes + custom ingress + auth middleware
Lower-level but more flexible; no licensing constraints; industry standard with mature ecosystem; higher operational overhead.
OpenFaaS or Knative
Dedicated serverless/function-as-a-service platforms; simpler for event-driven workloads; less monolithic; permissively licensed.
Hasura / Supabase
PostgreSQL-first backends with automatic API generation; strong open-source community; more mature; permissively licensed (Apache 2.0).
Build on 1backend with DEV.co software developers
Review the AGPL-3.0 licensing terms, validate security posture for your threat model, and test the Docker quickstart in a sandbox environment before committing to production adoption.
Talk to DEV.coRelated open-source tools
Surfaced by semantic similarity across the DEV.co open-source index.
Related on DEV.co
Explore the category and the services that help you build with it.
1backend FAQ
Can I use 1Backend commercially without open-sourcing my code?
What databases does 1Backend support?
Is there a managed/cloud version of 1Backend?
Can I integrate 1Backend with my existing auth system (LDAP, OKTA, Auth0)?
From evaluation to production software
DEV.co builds and maintains open-source devops systems for startups through enterprises. If 1backend fits your architecture, our custom software development services cover implementation, migration, and the long tail of maintenance.
Evaluate 1Backend for your infrastructure
Review the AGPL-3.0 licensing terms, validate security posture for your threat model, and test the Docker quickstart in a sandbox environment before committing to production adoption.