DEV.co
Open-Source Databases · GreptimeTeam

greptimedb

GreptimeDB is an open-source observability database that unifies metrics, logs, and traces into a single engine with SQL and PromQL query support, designed to replace Prometheus, Loki, and Elasticsearch. It uses columnar storage on object backends (S3, GCS, Azure) with tiered caching and claims up to 50× cost savings compared to traditional observability stacks.

Source: GitHub — github.com/GreptimeTeam/greptimedb
6.5k
GitHub stars
503
Forks
Rust
Primary language
Apache-2.0
License (OSI-approved)

Key facts

Objective fields from the source. Values we can't verify are shown as “Unknown” rather than guessed.

FieldValue
RepositoryGreptimeTeam/greptimedb
OwnerGreptimeTeam
Primary languageRust
LicenseApache-2.0 — OSI-approved
Stars6.5k
Forks503
Open issues202
Latest releasev1.1.2 (2026-07-02)
Last updated2026-07-08
Sourcehttps://github.com/GreptimeTeam/greptimedb

What greptimedb is

Written in Rust, GreptimeDB runs in standalone or distributed modes (Frontend, Datanode, Metasrv, optional Flownode). It natively ingests OpenTelemetry, Prometheus remote write, and Jaeger; queries via SQL and PromQL; and separates compute from storage using object storage as primary with memory+disk caching. Columnar engine with fulltext, inverted, and skipping indexes targets both analytical and high-concurrency point queries.

Quickstart

Get the greptimedb source

Clone the repository and explore it locally.

terminalbash
git clone https://github.com/GreptimeTeam/greptimedb.gitcd greptimedb# follow the project's README for install & configuration

Need it deployed, integrated, or customized instead? DEV.co ships production installs.

Best use cases

Replacing three-tier observability stacks

Single unified backend for metrics, logs, and traces eliminates operational complexity of running Prometheus + Loki + Elasticsearch; reduces dashboard fragmentation and enables cross-signal SQL joins.

High-cardinality observability at scale

Object-storage-backed columnar engine scales horizontally for millions of distinct label combinations without Thanos/Mimir complexity; sub-second queries on PB–EB scale via index strategies and compute-storage separation.

Cost-optimized telemetry ingest for AI/agents

Ingest high-volume GenAI telemetry (OTel conventions), store on cheap object storage, serve high-concurrency reads to SRE dashboards and AI agents via stateless read replicas—30-50× cost reduction vs. Elasticsearch/Loki.

Implementation considerations

  • Distributed mode requires standing up Frontend (stateless, scale horizontally), Datanode (region engine, persists to object storage), Metasrv (metadata/routing), and optional Flownode (streaming); plan for etcd or RDS backing store for metadata.
  • Object storage configuration (S3, GCS, Azure credentials, bucket/path policies) is mandatory in production; validate latency and cost assumptions for your cloud region and data access patterns.
  • Migration strategy should account for signal-by-signal onboarding: ingest metrics first (via Prometheus remote write), then logs (via OTel/Loki adapters), then traces (via Jaeger); avoid big-bang cutover.
  • Indexing strategy (fulltext, inverted, skipping indexes) requires tuning per table/column; defaults may not align with your cardinality profile; monitor index size and query performance during pilot.
  • OpenTelemetry instrumentation is native but not automatic; agents (OTel SDKs, collectors) must be deployed separately; ensure SDK/collector versions are compatible with GreptimeDB ingest protocol version.

When to avoid it — and what to weigh

  • Metrics-only or logs-only observability — If your stack is already optimized for single-signal observability (e.g., pure Prometheus), the unified approach adds no immediate benefit; consider migration complexity vs. incremental gains.
  • Sub-millisecond SLO requirements on fresh data — While indexes are available, tiered caching (memory → disk → object storage) introduces latency variance; not suitable for ultra-low-latency telemetry ingest pipelines requiring deterministic <1ms response times.
  • Zero operational tooling or vendor lock-in concerns — GreptimeDB is relatively young (created 2022, v1.1.2 current) with distributed mode requiring four components and metadata store (etcd/RDS); ops overhead is lower than Prometheus+Loki+ES but non-zero vs. fully managed SaaS.
  • Extensive third-party integrations out-of-the-box — Ecosystem is narrower than Prometheus/Elasticsearch; while it supports OTel, Prometheus remote write, and Jaeger, integrations with custom agents, legacy log shippers, or niche APM tools require evaluation per use case.

License & commercial use

Licensed under Apache License 2.0 (Apache-2.0), a permissive OSI-approved license. Permits commercial use, modification, and distribution with minimal restrictions (retain license and copyright notices, list significant changes, provide license copy).

Apache-2.0 allows commercial deployment without license fees or vendor approval. However, this is the open-source project; Greptime (the company behind it) offers commercial support and likely a managed/SaaS offering. For production use, evaluate whether support SLAs, security certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001), or uptime guarantees are required; requires vendor review. Self-hosted open-source carries no warranty or liability.

DEV.co evaluation signals

Editorial assessment — not user reviews. Directional, with an explicit confidence level.

SignalAssessment
MaintenanceActive
DocumentationAdequate
License clarityClear
Deployment complexityModerate
DEV.co fitGood
Assessment confidenceHigh
Security considerations

Apache-2.0 open-source does not guarantee security posture. Code is public and auditable (Rust reduces memory-safety bugs). No security audit, CVE history, or third-party attestation mentioned in provided data. Production deployments should: (1) isolate object storage credentials (IAM roles, temporary tokens); (2) enable TLS for gRPC/HTTP ingestion; (3) review Metasrv security (etcd/RDS access control); (4) audit multi-tenant isolation (if applicable). Requires security review before sensitive workloads.

Alternatives to consider

Prometheus + Grafana Loki + Elasticsearch

Best-of-breed per signal; mature ecosystems and large vendor support; significantly higher ops complexity (three stacks) and cost; no cross-signal queries in SQL; strong if you have existing deep expertise in each.

Grafana Mimir + Grafana Loki + Grafana Tempo

Unified UI via Grafana; high cardinality Prometheus alternative (Mimir); good logs/traces support; vendor-backed (Grafana Labs); less object-storage-native than GreptimeDB; can still require significant ops.

Managed SaaS (Datadog, Splunk, New Relic, Honeycomb)

Zero ops burden, integrated APM/SRE agents, built-in security/compliance certifications; no lock-in concerns (you own export); premium pricing; no direct SQL queries across signals; best for teams prioritizing time-to-value over cost.

Software development agency

Build on greptimedb with DEV.co software developers

GreptimeDB unifies metrics, logs, and traces in a single columnar engine. Start with a proof-of-concept using Docker, then migrate signals incrementally. For production deployments, engage Greptime for commercial support and managed SaaS options.

Talk to DEV.co

Related open-source tools

Surfaced by semantic similarity across the DEV.co open-source index.

Related on DEV.co

Explore the category and the services that help you build with it.

greptimedb FAQ

Can I use GreptimeDB in standalone mode for production?
Yes, standalone mode is supported for small to medium deployments (single machine). However, it lacks redundancy and horizontal scaling; distributed mode is recommended for HA and high-concurrency workloads. Standalone is suitable for proof-of-concept or edge deployments.
Do I have to migrate all three signal types (metrics, logs, traces) at once?
No. GreptimeDB accepts metrics via Prometheus remote write, logs via OTel collectors, and traces via Jaeger protocol. You can onboard signals incrementally; many users run metrics-only for months before adding logs/traces.
What is the cost model compared to Prometheus + Loki + ES?
Primary cost shifts from local/attached storage (Prometheus, Elasticsearch) to object storage (S3, GCS, Azure) egress. For read-heavy workloads, tiered caching (memory → disk → object) keeps recent data fast. Claimed 50× savings on traces, 30% on logs; actual savings depend on your access patterns, retention, and cloud region egress pricing. Compute (CPU/RAM) may be lower due to unified engine, but metadata store (etcd/RDS) is new operational cost.
Is GreptimeDB compliant with HIPAA, SOC 2, or PCI-DSS?
Unknown (not stated in provided data). The open-source project itself carries no warranty. If compliance is required, contact Greptime (the company) for managed/certified offerings, or conduct your own security audit of the codebase and deploy with appropriate controls.

Software developers & web developers for hire

DEV.co helps companies turn open-source tools like greptimedb into production software. Our software development services cover the full lifecycle — architecture, web development, integration, and maintenance — delivered by software developers and web developers who ship. Engage our software development agency to implement or customize it for your open-source databases stack.

Evaluate GreptimeDB for Your Observability Stack

GreptimeDB unifies metrics, logs, and traces in a single columnar engine. Start with a proof-of-concept using Docker, then migrate signals incrementally. For production deployments, engage Greptime for commercial support and managed SaaS options.