badger
Badger is a fast, embeddable key-value database written in pure Go. It is designed for SSD-optimized workloads and serves as the underlying storage for Dgraph and other production systems handling terabytes of data.
Key facts
Objective fields from the source. Values we can't verify are shown as “Unknown” rather than guessed.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Repository | dgraph-io/badger |
| Owner | dgraph-io |
| Primary language | Go |
| License | Apache-2.0 — OSI-approved |
| Stars | 15.7k |
| Forks | 1.3k |
| Open issues | 68 |
| Latest release | v4.9.3 (2026-07-06) |
| Last updated | 2026-07-07 |
| Source | https://github.com/dgraph-io/badger |
What badger is
Badger implements an LSM tree with a separate value log architecture (based on WiscKey), supporting concurrent ACID transactions with serializable snapshot isolation (SSI). It is written in pure Go with no Cgo dependencies, offers sorted KV access, TTL support, and multi-version capabilities.
Get the badger source
Clone the repository and explore it locally.
git clone https://github.com/dgraph-io/badger.gitcd badger# follow the project's README for install & configurationNeed it deployed, integrated, or customized instead? DEV.co ships production installs.
Best use cases
Implementation considerations
- Requires Go 1.23 or above; refrain from aggressive Go version bumps to minimize downstream breakage in consuming applications.
- ACID transactions with SSI provide strong consistency but may require application-level deadlock handling and retry logic for concurrent workloads.
- Value separation architecture trades write amplification for compaction pressure; monitor log file growth and enable periodic garbage collection.
- TTL and multi-version support must be explicitly configured; default behavior keeps all versions indefinitely until explicit cleanup.
- CLI tool (badger command) provides offline backup/restore but no live replication; backup strategy must be application-managed.
When to avoid it — and what to weigh
- Need distributed replication out-of-the-box — Badger is a single-node embedded database. Replication and clustering must be implemented in application logic; consider Dgraph if you need a distributed layer.
- Require non-Go language bindings or cross-platform SDKs — Badger is Go-native only. Projects needing Node.js, Python, Java, or other language APIs should explore RocksDB or other polyglot KV stores.
- Must minimize memory footprint in memory-constrained environments — LSM trees with value logs trade memory and disk I/O for write throughput. Highly memory-constrained devices may find B-tree databases more suitable.
- Need rotating disk (HDD) optimization — Badger is explicitly SSD-optimized. Performance on HDDs is not a design goal and will likely be poor due to the LSM architecture.
License & commercial use
Badger is licensed under Apache License 2.0 (Apache-2.0), a permissive OSI-approved open-source license.
Apache-2.0 is a permissive license that permits commercial use, modification, and distribution. Consult legal counsel to confirm compliance with attribution and liability disclaimers, especially for mission-critical deployments. No proprietary or restricted-use clauses apply.
DEV.co evaluation signals
Editorial assessment — not user reviews. Directional, with an explicit confidence level.
| Signal | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Maintenance | Active |
| Documentation | Strong |
| License clarity | Clear |
| Deployment complexity | Low |
| DEV.co fit | Strong |
| Assessment confidence | High |
Badger is used in production systems handling terabytes of data; nightly Jepsen-style testing with race flags validates transaction correctness and consistency under anomalies. No publicly disclosed CVEs reviewed here. No security audit details provided in data; evaluate encryption-at-rest and authentication requirements separately—Badger itself does not provide built-in encryption or user access controls. Data persistence and crash resilience are validated; treat as part of threat model for sensitive data.
Alternatives to consider
RocksDB
Battle-tested LSM tree with wider language bindings and ecosystem tools. Choose if non-Go integration or broader deployment flexibility is required, accepting higher complexity and C++ footprint.
BoltDB
Pure Go B-tree database with simpler transaction model (non-concurrent ACID). Lower write throughput but smaller footprint; suitable for modest-scale, read-heavy workloads.
Dgraph (for distributed graph queries)
If full-featured distributed graph queries and replication are needed, Dgraph (which uses Badger internally) eliminates the application-level orchestration burden.
Build on badger with DEV.co software developers
Assess your SSD infrastructure, Go stack, and single-node requirements. Review the official documentation and benchmarks at badger.dgraph.io, then prototype with v4 to validate write/read throughput.
Talk to DEV.coRelated on DEV.co
Explore the category and the services that help you build with it.
badger FAQ
Can I use Badger in a distributed system?
Does Badger provide encryption?
What is the minimum Go version?
Is Badger suitable for my HDD-based server?
Custom software development services
Need help beyond evaluating badger? DEV.co is a software development agency offering software development services and web development for teams of every size. Our software developers and web developers build custom software, web applications, APIs, and open-source databases integrations — and maintain them long-term.
Ready to evaluate Badger for your project?
Assess your SSD infrastructure, Go stack, and single-node requirements. Review the official documentation and benchmarks at badger.dgraph.io, then prototype with v4 to validate write/read throughput.