DEV.co
Open-Source LLM · meituan-longcat

LongCat-Flash-Chat

LongCat-Flash-Chat is a 560-billion-parameter open-source language model developed by Meituan using a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture. It dynamically activates 18.6–31.3 billion parameters per token (averaging ~27B) based on context, enabling efficient inference at >100 tokens/second. Licensed under MIT, it is free for commercial use. The model is positioned for agentic tasks, reasoning, and coding, with evaluation results competitive with DeepSeek V3.1 and Qwen3 MoE on most benchmarks.

Source: HuggingFace — huggingface.co/meituan-longcat/LongCat-Flash-Chat
561.9B
Parameters
mit
License (OSI-approved)
Unknown
Context (tokens)
83.6k
Downloads (30d)

Key facts

Objective fields from the source. Values we can't verify are shown as “Unknown” rather than guessed.

FieldValue
Developermeituan-longcat
Parameters561.9B
Context windowUnknown
Licensemit — OSI-approved
Modality / tasktext-generation
Gated on HuggingFaceNo
Downloads83.6k
Likes537
Last updated2025-09-24
Sourcemeituan-longcat/LongCat-Flash-Chat

What LongCat-Flash-Chat is

LongCat-Flash-Chat is a 560B-parameter MoE model with dynamic token-level parameter activation, shortcut-connected MoE (ScMoE) architecture to reduce communication overhead, and a multi-stage training pipeline optimized for agentic capabilities. Key architectural features include zero-computation experts, PID-controller-based expert load balancing, and deterministic computation for reproducibility. Context length extended to 128k during mid-training. Inference throughput >100 TPS. Model card references a technical report (arxiv:2509.01322) and eval results on 30+ benchmarks including MMLU, ArenaHard-V2, AIME25, and agentic tool-use tasks (τ²-Bench).

Quickstart

Run LongCat-Flash-Chat locally

Load the open weights with 🤗 Transformers and generate — the same model, self-hosted.

quickstart.pypython
from transformers import pipelinepipe = pipeline("text-generation", model="meituan-longcat/LongCat-Flash-Chat")out = pipe("Explain retrieval-augmented generation in one sentence.",           max_new_tokens=128)print(out[0]["generated_text"])

Swap in vLLM or Ollama for production-grade serving. DEV.co can stand up the inference stack.

Deployment

How you'd run it

A typical self-hosted path — open weights, an inference server, your application.

DEV.co builds each layer — from GPU infrastructure to the application.

Best use cases

Agentic Task Automation

Strong performance on τ²-Bench agentic benchmarks (telecom 73.68, retail 71.27) indicates suitability for autonomous tool-use workflows, API orchestration, and multi-step agent loops requiring iterative reasoning and environmental interaction.

Self-Hosted Reasoning & Coding Applications

Competitive AIME25 (61.25) and LiveCodeBench (48.02) scores, combined with MoE efficiency enabling cost-effective inference on commodity hardware, make this suitable for in-house code generation, math tutoring, and logic-heavy applications where data privacy requires on-premises deployment.

Multi-Lingual & Multi-Domain RAG Backends

Strong CEval (90.44) and CMMLU (84.34) results support Chinese and English domains. MoE architecture with dynamic token-level computation allows efficient batching for retrieval-augmented generation pipelines without proportional cost scaling.

Running & fine-tuning it

ESTIMATE (not explicitly stated in card): ~560B parameters at fp32 = ~2.2TB (not practical); at bfloat16/fp16 = ~1.1TB. With MoE dynamic activation (~27B avg per token), inference-time memory demand reduced. Typical deployment: multi-GPU setup (8× H100/A100 80GB or equivalent) for full model; quantized/LoRA variants may run on 2–4 GPUs. Requires verification of actual VRAM footprint, quantization strategies, and batching overhead from source repo.

Model card lists 'custom_code' tag, indicating custom modules (likely ScMoE, zero-computation experts). Standard LoRA/QLoRA compatibility Unknown. Full fine-tuning feasible on multi-GPU clusters; LoRA suitability requires review of expert layer structure and framework support (transformers, PEFT). Recommend consulting official repository or technical report for quantization and fine-tuning guidance.

When to avoid it — and what to weigh

  • Requirement for Proprietary Model Guarantees — Community-maintained open-source model with Unknown support SLA. If production SLA and incident response are critical, consider commercial alternatives (GPT-4, Claude, Gemini).
  • Visual or Multimodal Tasks — Model card specifies text-generation pipeline only. No evidence of vision, image generation, or audio capabilities. Use multimodal models if required.
  • Highly Constrained Edge Devices — 560B parameters require significant VRAM even with MoE sparsity. Quantization and pruning strategies Unknown. If deployment target is mobile, embedded systems, or <8 GB VRAM environments, smaller models are necessary.
  • Real-Time Compliance or Deterministic Output Guarantees — Deterministic computation mentioned for training reproducibility, not inference. Output consistency across runs and formal compliance audit trails are Unknown.

License & commercial use

Licensed under MIT, an OSI-approved permissive open-source license. Permits commercial use, modification, and distribution with attribution. No copyleft restrictions.

MIT license is permissive and explicitly allows commercial use. No gating, no model card restrictions stated. However: (1) Model is provided as-is with no warranty or support guarantee; (2) Deployment in production requires own infrastructure, testing, and compliance review (data privacy, bias, output guardrails); (3) No mention of SLA, liability limitations, or commercial indemnification in card. Recommend legal review for high-stakes use cases.

DEV.co evaluation signals

Editorial assessment — not user reviews. Directional, with an explicit confidence level.

SignalAssessment
MaintenanceActive
DocumentationAdequate
License clarityClear
Deployment complexityHigh
DEV.co fitStrong
Assessment confidenceHigh
Security considerations

No explicit security audit, red-teaming results, or adversarial robustness claims in card. Model trained on unknown data provenance. Custom code tag implies non-standard modules; code review recommended before production deployment. Standard LLM risks apply: prompt injection, hallucination, bias, token leakage. Meituan-controlled model; no independent security certification stated. For sensitive applications, conduct own security review and implement input/output filters.

Alternatives to consider

DeepSeek V3.1

Comparable 671B MoE model with 37B activation, strong benchmarks (ArenaHard-V2: 84.10 vs LongCat's 86.50, but DeepSeek leads AIME25: 49.27 vs 61.25). Consider if stricter performance on specific reasoning tasks is priority.

Qwen3 MoE-2507

Smaller footprint (235B, 22B activation) with stronger MMLU-Pro (84.83 vs 82.68) and MATH500 (98.80 vs 96.40). Better for hardware-constrained deployments.

Llama 3.2 (405B) or Mistral Large

Non-MoE dense alternatives with established production pipelines, better documentation, and commercial support options if full service SLA required.

Software development agency

Ship LongCat-Flash-Chat with senior software developers

LongCat-Flash-Chat offers competitive performance and low-latency inference for agentic workflows and reasoning tasks. Explore Devco's custom LLM app development and private deployment services to integrate this model into your production stack—with full data privacy and no third-party API dependency.

Talk to DEV.co

Related open-source tools

Surfaced by semantic similarity across the DEV.co open-source index.

LongCat-Flash-Chat FAQ

Can I use LongCat-Flash-Chat commercially?
Yes. MIT license allows commercial use, modification, and distribution. However, no warranty or support is provided. You are responsible for compliance, testing, bias mitigation, and deployment infrastructure. Recommend legal review for high-stakes use.
What hardware do I need to run this model?
Estimate: 1.1 TB VRAM for full bfloat16 model. Typical multi-GPU setup: 8× H100/A100 (80GB each) or 4× H100 (80GB) with careful batching. Exact requirements depend on quantization strategy and serving framework. Verify in official GitHub repo.
How long are the input contexts it can handle?
Context length extended to 128k during mid-training, per model card. Actual inference support and performance degradation at max length require verification from deployment docs or technical report.
Is this model suitable for real-time inference at scale?
MoE architecture achieves >100 tokens/second, suggesting good throughput. However, actual real-world latency depends on hardware, quantization, batch size, and deployment framework. Requires benchmarking on your target infrastructure.

Software development & web development with DEV.co

Need help beyond evaluating LongCat-Flash-Chat? DEV.co is a software development agency offering software development services and web development for teams of every size. Our software developers and web developers build custom software, web applications, APIs, and open-source llms integrations — and maintain them long-term.

Ready to Deploy an Efficient Open-Source LLM?

LongCat-Flash-Chat offers competitive performance and low-latency inference for agentic workflows and reasoning tasks. Explore Devco's custom LLM app development and private deployment services to integrate this model into your production stack—with full data privacy and no third-party API dependency.